This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mirzayi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Interfase. Could you please specify which source you refer to is the "reliable" one, and which of them are exactly independent that you felt the need to revert me? I'm afraid I don't find your revert reason sufficient. Regards, ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 10:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
And yes, they are independent sources because they are not closely affiliated with the subject.– That's not what independent means actually, it usually is the opposite because of close affiliation. I'm sorry, but you didn't address my concerns: which of the sources you returned are WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:RS, please be specific. Regards, ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 19:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mirzayi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Interfase. Could you please specify which source you refer to is the "reliable" one, and which of them are exactly independent that you felt the need to revert me? I'm afraid I don't find your revert reason sufficient. Regards, ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 10:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
And yes, they are independent sources because they are not closely affiliated with the subject.– That's not what independent means actually, it usually is the opposite because of close affiliation. I'm sorry, but you didn't address my concerns: which of the sources you returned are WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:RS, please be specific. Regards, ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 19:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)