This article was nominated for deletion on 23 May 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Russia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Izmailov, I.L. "Тюрко-Татарский Мир: Незаконнорожденные дети господ журналистов или о навязчивом шумеро-булгаризаторстве истории татар" [Turkic-Tatar World: Illegitimate children of gentlemen of journalists or about the obsessive Sumerian-Bulgarian nature of the history of the Tatars]. www.tataroved.ru (in Russian).

@ Qahramani44: I formatted the ref to proper standards. Feel free to correct the translation of the title and add a translation of the quote (which seems to be what you were referring to). Thanks, RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 23:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply

A recent revert by @ LouisAragon: is removing references, and it seems to me that this violates NPOV, as we are loosing information in favor of critic sources only. I would rather have seen those contextualized rather than reverted with a dubious comment. Please explain. Nojhan ( talk) 10:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC) reply