This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Minix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the late 1990s, the license for Minix was converted to open source – When? -- Hhielscher 10:50, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
April 2000 -- Karnesky 00:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I am starting a separate article for Minix 3. As prof. Andrew Tannenbaum quoted it : "MINIX 1 and MINIX 3 are related in the same way as Windows 3.1 and Windows XP are: same first name." ( http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/reliable-os/) Freedom to share 16:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Was glad to read of the separate Minx 3 article and it looks good. Still I think there's room here for the famous (as these things go) quote about Minix 3 not being your grandfather's Minix. It would underscore the significance of the differences and might strengthen the incentive to read the other article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.196.235 ( talk) 15:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
What's the history of the minix logo Image:Minix3.png?
Over time I have been looking for a book which can guide say a C/C++ programmer to write his own OS. Normally books only discuss the various modules(Memory Management, Process Management etc) and stop at that, in case of book on Minix by Andrew S. Tanenbaum it supplied the source code but didn't devote chapters on writing part of the souce code. Any such book available somewhere or is there a plan for the same on Wikibook/Wikiversity. Vjdchauhan 10:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC).
Good queston...Anyone have a answer? Im curious myself
With the exception of Minix-vmd, every instance of the name "minix" in this article is in all caps. Does this article belong at MINIX? Playstationman 10:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Lots of people are waiting on an ARM port of Minix! Wish they would push the priority of this port higher on the ToDo list! Sbmeirow ( talk) 22:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
" Lions' Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition, with Source Code (1976) contains the complete source code of the 6th Edition Unix kernel" The book was used to teach UNIX academically to Comp Sci students but AT&T forbid its dissemination after 1979. The Wiki article quotes Tannenbaum about this. Minix was an attempt at writing a clean kernel without violating AT&T copyrights. Without the need to teach students using "Unix-like" code the Operating Systems Design book would not have been written. Shjacks45 ( talk) 13:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on MINIX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi! First talk post here, I've only done minor edits, blah blah blah.
I've noticed that in the news, Intel has been found to have MINIX running on their chips, at ring -3, which may be used to plant a rootkit. I think that this is significant, and I am looking for opinions on whether or not I should add information to MINIX about the topic. Thanks for taking the time to read this!
--John Gillen ( talk) 17:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
--nitrofurano this controversial topic is indeed really very relevant, please add it in the wikipage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:ECAB:9E01:3D1D:E984:F17D:5BCD ( talk) 11:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MINIX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Didn't anyone teach you that "currently" has no place in an encyclopedic article? sheesh jae ( talk) 16:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Some edits I wrote were reverted were reverted as 'unsourced'. The first is on the dormancy of MINIX development, included a citation and was in agreement with the Minix 3 article. The second was on capitalisation, as has been noted above in this talk page. While this second edit did not add any new citations, it did align with the capitalisation used in the vast majority of existing citations, including MINIX's website. I'm writing this here as I don't have the powers necessary to write on the talk page of the reverting user. Per WP:TALK#DISCUSS, I will restore the reverted edits but am open to discussion here. Bespos ( talk) 23:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Minix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the late 1990s, the license for Minix was converted to open source – When? -- Hhielscher 10:50, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
April 2000 -- Karnesky 00:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I am starting a separate article for Minix 3. As prof. Andrew Tannenbaum quoted it : "MINIX 1 and MINIX 3 are related in the same way as Windows 3.1 and Windows XP are: same first name." ( http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/reliable-os/) Freedom to share 16:28, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Was glad to read of the separate Minx 3 article and it looks good. Still I think there's room here for the famous (as these things go) quote about Minix 3 not being your grandfather's Minix. It would underscore the significance of the differences and might strengthen the incentive to read the other article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.196.235 ( talk) 15:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
What's the history of the minix logo Image:Minix3.png?
Over time I have been looking for a book which can guide say a C/C++ programmer to write his own OS. Normally books only discuss the various modules(Memory Management, Process Management etc) and stop at that, in case of book on Minix by Andrew S. Tanenbaum it supplied the source code but didn't devote chapters on writing part of the souce code. Any such book available somewhere or is there a plan for the same on Wikibook/Wikiversity. Vjdchauhan 10:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC).
Good queston...Anyone have a answer? Im curious myself
With the exception of Minix-vmd, every instance of the name "minix" in this article is in all caps. Does this article belong at MINIX? Playstationman 10:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Lots of people are waiting on an ARM port of Minix! Wish they would push the priority of this port higher on the ToDo list! Sbmeirow ( talk) 22:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
" Lions' Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition, with Source Code (1976) contains the complete source code of the 6th Edition Unix kernel" The book was used to teach UNIX academically to Comp Sci students but AT&T forbid its dissemination after 1979. The Wiki article quotes Tannenbaum about this. Minix was an attempt at writing a clean kernel without violating AT&T copyrights. Without the need to teach students using "Unix-like" code the Operating Systems Design book would not have been written. Shjacks45 ( talk) 13:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on MINIX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi! First talk post here, I've only done minor edits, blah blah blah.
I've noticed that in the news, Intel has been found to have MINIX running on their chips, at ring -3, which may be used to plant a rootkit. I think that this is significant, and I am looking for opinions on whether or not I should add information to MINIX about the topic. Thanks for taking the time to read this!
--John Gillen ( talk) 17:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
--nitrofurano this controversial topic is indeed really very relevant, please add it in the wikipage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:ECAB:9E01:3D1D:E984:F17D:5BCD ( talk) 11:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on MINIX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Didn't anyone teach you that "currently" has no place in an encyclopedic article? sheesh jae ( talk) 16:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Some edits I wrote were reverted were reverted as 'unsourced'. The first is on the dormancy of MINIX development, included a citation and was in agreement with the Minix 3 article. The second was on capitalisation, as has been noted above in this talk page. While this second edit did not add any new citations, it did align with the capitalisation used in the vast majority of existing citations, including MINIX's website. I'm writing this here as I don't have the powers necessary to write on the talk page of the reverting user. Per WP:TALK#DISCUSS, I will restore the reverted edits but am open to discussion here. Bespos ( talk) 23:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)