This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mineral article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
Archives: 1 |
|
May 24, 2022, 13:24 - «partial rv, the edit introduced outright errors or MoS issues»
</nowiki>
and mistypos. Best.AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 13:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
<nowiki>
tags, a loose "1", and there was also mention of an O2+ species. I acknowledge that I didn't do a particularly good job of preserving your edits, but I don't have strong objections to reinstating them with the previous concerns in mind.
Maxim(talk)
14:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
…someone with less knowledge in both mineralogy and chemistryAgreed, but the idea is to keep it for those who understands them to visually and quickly differentiate compounds. Or, in case they would search for it by an element name. I find it important to specify molar anions as in minerals they are chemically bondeded. This may not be obvious if we simply give an element name. Just to ensure for instance that oxygen allotropes like O
What are the advantages of the minerals 2409:40E3:1019:60A4:28D3:C591:2CC3:EE99 ( talk) 14:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mineral article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
![]() | There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
Archives: 1 |
|
May 24, 2022, 13:24 - «partial rv, the edit introduced outright errors or MoS issues»
</nowiki>
and mistypos. Best.AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 13:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
<nowiki>
tags, a loose "1", and there was also mention of an O2+ species. I acknowledge that I didn't do a particularly good job of preserving your edits, but I don't have strong objections to reinstating them with the previous concerns in mind.
Maxim(talk)
14:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
…someone with less knowledge in both mineralogy and chemistryAgreed, but the idea is to keep it for those who understands them to visually and quickly differentiate compounds. Or, in case they would search for it by an element name. I find it important to specify molar anions as in minerals they are chemically bondeded. This may not be obvious if we simply give an element name. Just to ensure for instance that oxygen allotropes like O
What are the advantages of the minerals 2409:40E3:1019:60A4:28D3:C591:2CC3:EE99 ( talk) 14:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)