![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The Japanese version of Valentine's Day ( ja:バレンタインデー) appeared in the sixth episode of Minami-ke Okawari. Don't know if we should incorporate it into the article though. Here's an image of the moment in question. The fund raising notice at the top is still visible too, so they must have taken a shot of it only a few months ago.-- 十 八 04:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Is there any verifiable evidence that the animation studio behind series 1 wants their name romanised as the latter? Besides another easily editable Wikipedia page, that is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.70.126 ( talk) 07:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Ecchi elements? -- 68.161.182.144 ( talk) 12:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Is there any mention of the new season supposedly green lit? 78.105.250.11 ( talk) 00:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
The summary of the characters seems to be lacking important details. For example, why are the Minami girls living alone with no mother or father? What's their support? The character listing just baldly says that they are living in an apartment by themselves. -- Gwern (contribs) 04:10 12 November 2008 (GMT)
In Japan, he is not considered he is working. Because there are some reason about that.
In the manga section, after volumes, are listed two "funbooks." I'm fairly certain, especially after browsing these two links (with the same ISBN): TV Animation Book, Minami-ke+5-2 Book, that they are actually "fanbooks". Is there some special reason for calling them funbooks? Yeah it's nitpicky, but it just bothers me. Cicero225 ( talk) 08:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
From what I've researched, this is a last name, so Chiaki was being polite. While not actually part of the Minami-family, I think a strong friendship was created. No first name is given, but lost forever due to Kana. Was there sufficient data in episode 11 to consider Yamada notable? Tyciol ( talk) 00:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay then. Per WP:ELNO point 12: Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors. This wiki fails both those criteria, so it should be removed.-- 十 八 00:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
ELNO - "substantial number of editors" criteria is irrelevant, because an infinite number of monkeys can create "Hamlet" or one person(Shakespeare) can. It would be interesting to know why it was added to EL in the first place.
ELNO - "substantial history of stability" criteria is undefined. The wiki has been stable since inception.
The point in linking to external wikis from any Wiki farm is to help users find information beyond the scope of Wikipedia and that is not available from official sources.
It is also there to provide a place for users to add information that is beyond the scope of Wikipedia, and to foster and grow that information in order to come back and create better articles at Wikipedia.-- Sxerks ( talk) 20:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Right turn only review vol 1 -- KrebMarkt 17:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
needs information on the 5 music/drama cds 96.50.4.248 ( talk) 18:51, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
I looked at the Japanese article, and apparently there are now 8 manga volumes. There might be more new info I didn't see. Somebody who can read Japanese better than I should check it out. 71.199.12.36 ( talk) 04:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The Japanese version of Valentine's Day ( ja:バレンタインデー) appeared in the sixth episode of Minami-ke Okawari. Don't know if we should incorporate it into the article though. Here's an image of the moment in question. The fund raising notice at the top is still visible too, so they must have taken a shot of it only a few months ago.-- 十 八 04:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Is there any verifiable evidence that the animation studio behind series 1 wants their name romanised as the latter? Besides another easily editable Wikipedia page, that is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.70.126 ( talk) 07:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Ecchi elements? -- 68.161.182.144 ( talk) 12:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Is there any mention of the new season supposedly green lit? 78.105.250.11 ( talk) 00:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
The summary of the characters seems to be lacking important details. For example, why are the Minami girls living alone with no mother or father? What's their support? The character listing just baldly says that they are living in an apartment by themselves. -- Gwern (contribs) 04:10 12 November 2008 (GMT)
In Japan, he is not considered he is working. Because there are some reason about that.
In the manga section, after volumes, are listed two "funbooks." I'm fairly certain, especially after browsing these two links (with the same ISBN): TV Animation Book, Minami-ke+5-2 Book, that they are actually "fanbooks". Is there some special reason for calling them funbooks? Yeah it's nitpicky, but it just bothers me. Cicero225 ( talk) 08:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
From what I've researched, this is a last name, so Chiaki was being polite. While not actually part of the Minami-family, I think a strong friendship was created. No first name is given, but lost forever due to Kana. Was there sufficient data in episode 11 to consider Yamada notable? Tyciol ( talk) 00:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay then. Per WP:ELNO point 12: Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors. This wiki fails both those criteria, so it should be removed.-- 十 八 00:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
ELNO - "substantial number of editors" criteria is irrelevant, because an infinite number of monkeys can create "Hamlet" or one person(Shakespeare) can. It would be interesting to know why it was added to EL in the first place.
ELNO - "substantial history of stability" criteria is undefined. The wiki has been stable since inception.
The point in linking to external wikis from any Wiki farm is to help users find information beyond the scope of Wikipedia and that is not available from official sources.
It is also there to provide a place for users to add information that is beyond the scope of Wikipedia, and to foster and grow that information in order to come back and create better articles at Wikipedia.-- Sxerks ( talk) 20:12, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Right turn only review vol 1 -- KrebMarkt 17:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
needs information on the 5 music/drama cds 96.50.4.248 ( talk) 18:51, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
I looked at the Japanese article, and apparently there are now 8 manga volumes. There might be more new info I didn't see. Somebody who can read Japanese better than I should check it out. 71.199.12.36 ( talk) 04:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)