Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 ( talk · contribs) 14:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC) reply

I'm starting a review of this article. North8000 ( talk) 14:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Review discussion

I ran into various small items but was able to tweak them myself. North8000 ( talk) 00:31, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply

GA criteria final checklist

Well-written

• Meets this criteria sufficiently for Good Article. To go to the next plateau, you might want to seek out and use some sources that get into other overall aspects. (culture, acceptance, motivation etc. that also make it "flow") My gut feel that there is a huge amount of facts presented here in a very slightly "choppy" manner. Not big deal and fine for GA, but that be a nice effort if you want to take it to the "next level" beyond that. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 00:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Factually accurate and verifiable

• Meets this criteria. North8000 ( talk) 00:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Broad in its coverage

• Meets this criteria. Suppifiently broad and comprehensive to mee GA criteria. See "Well written" section for a few suggestion if you care to take it to the next level. North8000 ( talk) 00:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

• Meets this criteria. North8000 ( talk) 12:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

• Meets this criteria. North8000 ( talk) 14:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Illustrated, if possible, by images

• Meets this criteria. Article has 17 images. All are free, so no article-specific use rationales are required. North8000 ( talk) 11:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Result

This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. Congratulations! What an immense about of interesting material has been included in this article! North8000 ( talk) 00:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Reviewer reply