This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to the Croatian Parliament, Opačić is an ethnic Serb.
"Zastupnici 4. saziva Hrvatskoga sabora: MILANKA OPAČIĆ". Sabor. Rođena je 17.4.1968. u Zagrebu. Srpkinja. Završila Fakultet političkih znanosti u Zagrebu; dipl. politologinja.
Tuvixer (
talk ·
contribs) removed this with the comment "
the source is old, stop this and if you want a constructive discussion go to the talk page, tnx", and then
warned me two times (!). I
warned him for vandalism. @
Tuvixer: Do you have any real explanation why this is unconstructive? I am really assuming good faith here.--
Zoupan
21:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Note that
Tuvixer (
talk ·
contribs) is an user that mainly edits articles on Croatian politics. He did not bother to read the Croatian WP article which includes her ethnic origin.
He had this comment on my report (claiming "dubious material"). Here you have the scanned 1992 document of the Croatian Parliament, explicitly stating that Milanka Opačić was the 9th elective of a total of 13 from the Serb community to the Croatian Parliament: "IZBOR ZASTUPNIKA U ZASTUPNIČKI DOM SABORA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE" (Document). Republic of Croatia. 1992. Srbi kao pripadnici nacionalne manjine ... 9. Milanka Opačić
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help).--
Zoupan
22:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I honestly have a hard time understanding Tuvixer's position. That she represented Serbs in the parliament is beyond dispute. Sources have been provided. Tuvixer dismissed them on a whim. How can a source confirming someone's ethnicity be outdated? Then again, the mere statement of fact as added by Zoupan looks very awkward and simply begs the question of relevance. Is it not possible to say exactly what the source says, as quoted by Zoupan? Surtsicna ( talk) 23:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I removed this from the third opinion noticeboard because a third opinion appears to have already been given. If there is still a dispute here, consider opening a thread at the dispute resolution noticeboard. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 04:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Milanka Opačić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to the Croatian Parliament, Opačić is an ethnic Serb.
"Zastupnici 4. saziva Hrvatskoga sabora: MILANKA OPAČIĆ". Sabor. Rođena je 17.4.1968. u Zagrebu. Srpkinja. Završila Fakultet političkih znanosti u Zagrebu; dipl. politologinja.
Tuvixer (
talk ·
contribs) removed this with the comment "
the source is old, stop this and if you want a constructive discussion go to the talk page, tnx", and then
warned me two times (!). I
warned him for vandalism. @
Tuvixer: Do you have any real explanation why this is unconstructive? I am really assuming good faith here.--
Zoupan
21:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Note that
Tuvixer (
talk ·
contribs) is an user that mainly edits articles on Croatian politics. He did not bother to read the Croatian WP article which includes her ethnic origin.
He had this comment on my report (claiming "dubious material"). Here you have the scanned 1992 document of the Croatian Parliament, explicitly stating that Milanka Opačić was the 9th elective of a total of 13 from the Serb community to the Croatian Parliament: "IZBOR ZASTUPNIKA U ZASTUPNIČKI DOM SABORA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE" (Document). Republic of Croatia. 1992. Srbi kao pripadnici nacionalne manjine ... 9. Milanka Opačić
{{
cite document}}
: Unknown parameter |url=
ignored (
help).--
Zoupan
22:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I honestly have a hard time understanding Tuvixer's position. That she represented Serbs in the parliament is beyond dispute. Sources have been provided. Tuvixer dismissed them on a whim. How can a source confirming someone's ethnicity be outdated? Then again, the mere statement of fact as added by Zoupan looks very awkward and simply begs the question of relevance. Is it not possible to say exactly what the source says, as quoted by Zoupan? Surtsicna ( talk) 23:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I removed this from the third opinion noticeboard because a third opinion appears to have already been given. If there is still a dispute here, consider opening a thread at the dispute resolution noticeboard. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 04:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Milanka Opačić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)