This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-1 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
More effort needs to be put into completing the infobox. Askari Mark | Talk 18:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 12:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Someone please type in how much ammunition it could carry for its guns! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.147.232.231 ( talk) 18:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Harrison49 ( talk) 00:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A very interesting article. It does however need some tweaks before it can be passed.
Thanks for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 20:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-1 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
More effort needs to be put into completing the infobox. Askari Mark | Talk 18:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 12:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Someone please type in how much ammunition it could carry for its guns! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.147.232.231 ( talk) 18:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Harrison49 ( talk) 00:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A very interesting article. It does however need some tweaks before it can be passed.
Thanks for the review.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 20:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)