This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mihail Manoilescu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a good article, but the last paragraph doesn't quite make sense:
Why would Manoilescu be tried after he was dead and buried? Maybe this last sentence belongs in a previous paragraph? But the one above says he kept being tried (not in absentia) and put in jail almost all the time from 1944 on.... Turgidson 03:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, they did not want to be known about his death, probably not about the date and not about the circumstances. The family has been officially informed about his death after 8 years, when I assume it was no possibility anymore for identification, by this also not giving the family the opportunity to bury him properly .-- Anonim0011 ( talk) 18:48, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Whoa, hold the presses: I just found this - don't know if the link works, I viewed it in html and it would not open in pdf, but that may be a problem with this computer's settings. We can use it from html, in the worst case scenario. Dahn 17:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Really Latin America? I want to see any government in the world that had applied his policies, of creating a corporatist government ruled directly by the corporations itself. Cause I know that sort of government have not exist in history even in Italy (as Manoilescu constantly argue) I deleted the sentence.
You may found groups, that supported the corporatist view of him, thats different. But surely you may also, find they were very few, and no movements supported directly his ideas.
Why the article is so distorted against Manoilescu? It needs to be clean and neutralized. Wikipedia is not a political nor a ideological standpoint.-- Tercerista ( talk) 12:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Dear IP, please stop removing content referenced to reliable sources and do not change such content just because you don't agree with sources. This is not metapedia: when the subject of an article is a fascist supporter, he doesn't get a complimentary whitewashing. Thank you! Anonimu ( talk) 07:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Just keep walking buddy,you are not welcome here. And do not try to get a lawyer. We know the "fascist" story and we also know what Jewish services pay for these stories. 82.76.116.46 ( talk) 05:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Mihail Manoilescu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wsgn.uni-ffo.de/graduierte/manoilescu.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The man right on the photo of the Second Vienna Award in the Belverdere Palast is not Mihail Manoilescu, but the Italian Foreign minister count Galeazzo Ciano. He is wearing an Italian uniform. Manoilescu is not on the photo, so the photo is of no use here and should be removed.-- Fal63 ( talk) 12:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
These are the photos you are looking for:
http://www.dacoromania-alba.ro/nr76/75_ani2.jpg
http://www.dacoromania-alba.ro/nr76/75_ani3.jpg 86.126.10.5 ( talk) 07:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mihail Manoilescu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a good article, but the last paragraph doesn't quite make sense:
Why would Manoilescu be tried after he was dead and buried? Maybe this last sentence belongs in a previous paragraph? But the one above says he kept being tried (not in absentia) and put in jail almost all the time from 1944 on.... Turgidson 03:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, they did not want to be known about his death, probably not about the date and not about the circumstances. The family has been officially informed about his death after 8 years, when I assume it was no possibility anymore for identification, by this also not giving the family the opportunity to bury him properly .-- Anonim0011 ( talk) 18:48, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Whoa, hold the presses: I just found this - don't know if the link works, I viewed it in html and it would not open in pdf, but that may be a problem with this computer's settings. We can use it from html, in the worst case scenario. Dahn 17:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Really Latin America? I want to see any government in the world that had applied his policies, of creating a corporatist government ruled directly by the corporations itself. Cause I know that sort of government have not exist in history even in Italy (as Manoilescu constantly argue) I deleted the sentence.
You may found groups, that supported the corporatist view of him, thats different. But surely you may also, find they were very few, and no movements supported directly his ideas.
Why the article is so distorted against Manoilescu? It needs to be clean and neutralized. Wikipedia is not a political nor a ideological standpoint.-- Tercerista ( talk) 12:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Dear IP, please stop removing content referenced to reliable sources and do not change such content just because you don't agree with sources. This is not metapedia: when the subject of an article is a fascist supporter, he doesn't get a complimentary whitewashing. Thank you! Anonimu ( talk) 07:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Just keep walking buddy,you are not welcome here. And do not try to get a lawyer. We know the "fascist" story and we also know what Jewish services pay for these stories. 82.76.116.46 ( talk) 05:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Mihail Manoilescu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wsgn.uni-ffo.de/graduierte/manoilescu.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The man right on the photo of the Second Vienna Award in the Belverdere Palast is not Mihail Manoilescu, but the Italian Foreign minister count Galeazzo Ciano. He is wearing an Italian uniform. Manoilescu is not on the photo, so the photo is of no use here and should be removed.-- Fal63 ( talk) 12:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
These are the photos you are looking for:
http://www.dacoromania-alba.ro/nr76/75_ani2.jpg
http://www.dacoromania-alba.ro/nr76/75_ani3.jpg 86.126.10.5 ( talk) 07:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)