This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wonder if the English translations of titles are the names of actual published translations or simply ad hoc translations, in which case they should probably be deleted. Thoughts anyone? -- Viajero 04:28, Sep 22, 2003 (UTC)
I deleted someone's editorial discussion from the article. Discussion is appropriately inserted in the Discussion section not in the article itself. LAWinans ( talk) 18:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that there are not many references for this article.. Can I help with that?? Also I am doing research on Unamuno and his philosophy, Could we expand that section? Not too much of course because it would throw off the balance of the article. Unamuno was a Philosopher at his core, and he wrote novels, and stories, to express his views. I have three or four books on Unamuno, some are in Spanish. Are we allowed to cite them or can we only cite material that is available on the internet?? I'm a new user but I have been studying WP policies, so I request your forbearance. aharon42 ( talk) 18:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Miguel de Unamuno was a Roman Catholic believer until he was 22 years old. After that he became a agnostic, which he was for the rest of his life. His major books easily prove his agnosticism, like can be seen by this entry. These quotations from Wikiquote [1] also provide enough evidence for his self-declared agnosticism, that can be corroborated by his classical essay Del Sentimiento Trágico de la Vida and by the general matter of his works. Mistico ( talk) 00:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Unamuno.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 23 March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Unamuno.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 07:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miguel de Unamuno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
The box in the top right-hand corner lists the schools of philosophy with which Unamuno is associated as both positivism and existentialism. How can this be, when these schools of philosophy are polar opposites? Vorbee ( talk) 19:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
"Unamuno died while sleeping, which he regarded as the best and most painless way to die." Is this really relevant? Should we add a similar note to any biographic article about people who died in their sleep? Kumagoro-42 ( talk) 12:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wonder if the English translations of titles are the names of actual published translations or simply ad hoc translations, in which case they should probably be deleted. Thoughts anyone? -- Viajero 04:28, Sep 22, 2003 (UTC)
I deleted someone's editorial discussion from the article. Discussion is appropriately inserted in the Discussion section not in the article itself. LAWinans ( talk) 18:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that there are not many references for this article.. Can I help with that?? Also I am doing research on Unamuno and his philosophy, Could we expand that section? Not too much of course because it would throw off the balance of the article. Unamuno was a Philosopher at his core, and he wrote novels, and stories, to express his views. I have three or four books on Unamuno, some are in Spanish. Are we allowed to cite them or can we only cite material that is available on the internet?? I'm a new user but I have been studying WP policies, so I request your forbearance. aharon42 ( talk) 18:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Miguel de Unamuno was a Roman Catholic believer until he was 22 years old. After that he became a agnostic, which he was for the rest of his life. His major books easily prove his agnosticism, like can be seen by this entry. These quotations from Wikiquote [1] also provide enough evidence for his self-declared agnosticism, that can be corroborated by his classical essay Del Sentimiento Trágico de la Vida and by the general matter of his works. Mistico ( talk) 00:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Unamuno.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 23 March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Unamuno.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 07:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miguel de Unamuno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
The box in the top right-hand corner lists the schools of philosophy with which Unamuno is associated as both positivism and existentialism. How can this be, when these schools of philosophy are polar opposites? Vorbee ( talk) 19:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
"Unamuno died while sleeping, which he regarded as the best and most painless way to die." Is this really relevant? Should we add a similar note to any biographic article about people who died in their sleep? Kumagoro-42 ( talk) 12:42, 19 July 2020 (UTC)