![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2020 and 12 May 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Bannock.burn8.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I would like to comply with Verifiability and use in-line citations, but the policy is for 1) quotations and 2) material likely to be challenged, neither of which seem to apply here. Or do they? Cenksumen ( talk) 14:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Can someone please add citation to "Controversy"?
http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i37/Microplastic-Beads-Pollute-Great-Lakes.html
Kschang77 ( talk) 06:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
This one also. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X13006097 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geothermal ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Can someone add that Minnesota has been added as yet another banned state? Also, provide sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.16.54 ( talk) 01:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't see a problem with merging this article with polyethylene microspheres, as long as proper differentiation is made.
MidnightAurora ( talk) 12:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The problem I have with a merge is that these are sufficiently different in purpose to warrant their own articles, and if written fully they would be too large for one article. My solution is not the most graceful, so if you do not like it feel free to revert me and we will discuss. AioftheStorm ( talk) 21:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
This and several other articles point to the technology for biodegradable microbeads: [1] Can someone who understands this better please add it to this article? Kortoso ( talk) 22:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Microbead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Wtmitchell. You reverted my edit on Microbeads because I didn't provide a source. Apologies if my edit was unclear, but I was relying upon the Science retraction, which is in fact cited. Thanks. -- 193.157.251.132 ( talk) 15:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't align with the table properly, and I'm not even sure that the table itself is full. 81.2.103.240 ( talk) 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2020 and 12 May 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Bannock.burn8.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I would like to comply with Verifiability and use in-line citations, but the policy is for 1) quotations and 2) material likely to be challenged, neither of which seem to apply here. Or do they? Cenksumen ( talk) 14:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Can someone please add citation to "Controversy"?
http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i37/Microplastic-Beads-Pollute-Great-Lakes.html
Kschang77 ( talk) 06:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
This one also. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X13006097 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geothermal ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Can someone add that Minnesota has been added as yet another banned state? Also, provide sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.16.54 ( talk) 01:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't see a problem with merging this article with polyethylene microspheres, as long as proper differentiation is made.
MidnightAurora ( talk) 12:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
The problem I have with a merge is that these are sufficiently different in purpose to warrant their own articles, and if written fully they would be too large for one article. My solution is not the most graceful, so if you do not like it feel free to revert me and we will discuss. AioftheStorm ( talk) 21:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
This and several other articles point to the technology for biodegradable microbeads: [1] Can someone who understands this better please add it to this article? Kortoso ( talk) 22:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Microbead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Wtmitchell. You reverted my edit on Microbeads because I didn't provide a source. Apologies if my edit was unclear, but I was relying upon the Science retraction, which is in fact cited. Thanks. -- 193.157.251.132 ( talk) 15:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
It doesn't align with the table properly, and I'm not even sure that the table itself is full. 81.2.103.240 ( talk) 21:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)