| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
MicroStrategy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 15 days
 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
 | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Is the reason for not including the association this company has with hacking allegations in this article is because there's not even a single blog or news covering it, or is it because it's unreliable (I have no idea)? However, I feel like it is better to just go with a non-bureaucratic (I have no better word) approach and add this uncovered hacking stuff to the article mostly for completeness. Agree or not? Also, can someone add the other logo or is it not possible due to copyright issues? WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - ( talk) 10:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- To add: Most people will see the Wikipedia article for this hacking coverage. I'm pretty sure that is notable, or at least more notable than some other entire articles. Don't be a jerk. WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - ( talk) 10:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
MicroStrategy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 15 days
|
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
| The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Is the reason for not including the association this company has with hacking allegations in this article is because there's not even a single blog or news covering it, or is it because it's unreliable (I have no idea)? However, I feel like it is better to just go with a non-bureaucratic (I have no better word) approach and add this uncovered hacking stuff to the article mostly for completeness. Agree or not? Also, can someone add the other logo or is it not possible due to copyright issues? WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - ( talk) 10:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- To add: Most people will see the Wikipedia article for this hacking coverage. I'm pretty sure that is notable, or at least more notable than some other entire articles. Don't be a jerk. WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - ( talk) 10:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)