Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Michelle Lyons appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the new yorker article apparently autocited conde nast (the fashion brand) as an author. can someone please fix it? i'm not too familiar with fixing the citations. thanks. Bremps 09:48, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
00:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bremps ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Created by Bremps ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC).
I *think* I'm exempt from having to do QPQ, since this is my 2nd nomination. Do multiple alts count as many nominations?
Bremps
03:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
@ Kingoflettuce: Thanks for the suggestions. I did some light trimming on the text, removed some extraneous citations, and added in the info on the ghost baby. I unfortunately can't remove one of the LADBible sources, since it appears to be an exclusive interview. Are we good to go? Bremps! 19:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the tick. I'll also wait for an another opinion. Bremps! 19:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
I was going to edit the most obvious mistakes (see below), but the whole article needs rewriting. As it stands it reads like a badly sub-edited tabloid piece. I'd even suggest that there's a case to be made that the subject isn't notable enough to be in Wikipedia at all
> "she had saw" should be: "she had seen"
> "sexist discrimination" should be: "sex discrimination" (it may be sexist, but that isn't the usual phrase)
> "Lyons has changed her views surrounding the death penalty after she learned of her pregnancy" should read: "Lyons changed her views... etc" HieronymousCrowley ( talk) 05:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Michelle Lyons appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
the new yorker article apparently autocited conde nast (the fashion brand) as an author. can someone please fix it? i'm not too familiar with fixing the citations. thanks. Bremps 09:48, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
00:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bremps ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Created by Bremps ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC).
I *think* I'm exempt from having to do QPQ, since this is my 2nd nomination. Do multiple alts count as many nominations?
Bremps
03:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
@ Kingoflettuce: Thanks for the suggestions. I did some light trimming on the text, removed some extraneous citations, and added in the info on the ghost baby. I unfortunately can't remove one of the LADBible sources, since it appears to be an exclusive interview. Are we good to go? Bremps! 19:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the tick. I'll also wait for an another opinion. Bremps! 19:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
I was going to edit the most obvious mistakes (see below), but the whole article needs rewriting. As it stands it reads like a badly sub-edited tabloid piece. I'd even suggest that there's a case to be made that the subject isn't notable enough to be in Wikipedia at all
> "she had saw" should be: "she had seen"
> "sexist discrimination" should be: "sex discrimination" (it may be sexist, but that isn't the usual phrase)
> "Lyons has changed her views surrounding the death penalty after she learned of her pregnancy" should read: "Lyons changed her views... etc" HieronymousCrowley ( talk) 05:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)