![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Under Gen. Michael V. Hayden the NSA has forced telecom companies to implement massive domestic spying hardware. Even though Gen. Hayden has said at the National Press Club that "As the director, I was the one responsible to ensure that this program was limited in its scope and disciplined in its application." The NarusInsight is one type of domestic spying hardware. Capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime. For reference thats monitoring 39000 DSL lines in realtime for every piece of hardware. After data capture Narus softeware can replay data. What does this mean well according to Narus website "Capabilities include playback of streaming media (for example, VoIP), rendering of Web pages, examination of e-mails and the ability to analyze the payload/attachments of e-mail or file transfer protocols." References: Narus Ltd http://narus.com, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB Transcript: http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/news/2006/intell-060123-dni01.htm www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1564046/posts Hoover's company factsheet: http://www.hoovers.com/narus/--ID__60701--/free-co-factsheet.xhtml Report by bewert: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/8/14724/28476 EFF case against AT&T http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/ AbrahamLincoln24 23:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
yes it meets all these rules. it has no unpublished data. It is very neutral. All fatcs in the post come from reliable references that I site. 69.107.100.9 01:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC) AbrahamLincoln24 01:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme On 17 OCT 2002 Gen. Hayden goes before the Joint Inquiry of the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence basicly to explain were was the NSA durring the Sept 11 acttacts. Durring his testomony he explains his stradegy "Another part of our strategy for nearly three years has been a shift to a greater reliance on American industry (telecom). We have been moving along this path steadily and we have the metrics to show it. As you know, in project GROUNDBREAKER we have already outsourced a significant portion of our information technology so that we can concentrate on mission. We have partnered with academia for our systems engineering. I have met personally with prominent corporate executive officers(AT&T Verizon etc)." Under the CALEA law telecom companies are force to help the NSA. Reference http://intelligence.senate.gov/0210hrg/021017/hayden.pdf AbrahamLincoln24 03:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone have any problems for the post of narus relatting to Gen. Hayden. AbrahamLincoln24 05:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Matarhyme lets try to keep this Civil. Please don't show bias by accussing me of breaking laws and blabbing secrets. As a 29yrd US vetern who had some type of secret cleance know better than most what is secret and what is not. 1.Anything you can find in public record or on a corparate website is not clisified. 2. Maby the word "forced" is to strong of a word I will bend and put "worked with" in my post. 3. This post is totaly relevent because Gen. Hayden has said this program is one of his greatest acomplishments. He has also said "I have met personally with prominent corporate executive officers(AT&T Verizon etc)." 4. My statement CALEA is not wrong. I think tou should read the CALEA law. CALEA law SEC. 102 part (5) "The term `government' means the government of the United States and any agency or instrumentality thereof, the District of Columbia, any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, and any State or political subdivision thereof authorized by law to conduct electronic surveillance." Please lets keep this CIVIL. http://www.askcalea.net/calea.html 69.107.100.9 15:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC) AbrahamLincoln24 15:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
How about this?
Metarhyme 15:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme thank you for working with me. I want to stick with my post. This is what Im trying to convey in my post. I want to give scope and size to Gen. Hayden biggest acomplishment. Using the example of the NarusInsight is one way to do this. I dont want to use any phrase like "questioned his honesty" beacuse he ether miss statted somthing or he did not. AbrahamLincoln24 16:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I cleaned it up - does that suit you? Metarhyme 16:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme please help me combine these 2 post and I think we have a winner. Also correction to grammer would help. AbrahamLincoln24 17:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Narus ST-6400 and NarusInsight by Narus Ltd. Under Gen. Michael V. Hayden the NSA has worked with telecom companies to implement massive domestic spying hardware. Even though Gen. Hayden has said at the National Press Club that "As the director, I was the one responsible to ensure that this program was limited in its scope and disciplined in its application." The NarusInsight is one type of domestic spying hardware. Capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime. For reference thats monitoring 39,000 DSL lines in realtime for every piece of hardware. After data capture Narus softeware can replay data. According to Narus website replay data definition is "Capabilities include playback of streaming media (for example, VoIP), rendering of Web pages, examination of e-mails and the ability to analyze the payload/attachments of e-mail or file transfer protocols." References: Narus Ltd http://narus.com, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB Transcript: http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/news/2006/intell-060123-dni01.htm www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1564046/posts Hoover's company factsheet: http://www.hoovers.com/narus/--ID__60701--/free-co-factsheet.xhtml EFF case against AT&T http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/ http://www.askcalea.net/calea.html
Here's my try at NPOV combo:
Metarhyme 18:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Almost there heres mine... AbrahamLincoln24 21:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC) Perposed titled Gen. Michael V. Hayden strategy for the NSA
Gen. Michael V. Hayden strategy for the NSA
Metarhyme I think I been a sport and bent over backwards. I've taken out the word "massive", even though installing hardware like NarusInsight at evry telecom company is by definition massive. I've taken out the word "forced", even though CALEA law proves it. I've taken out miss statements that Gen. Hayden has said about the domestic spy program and he has made alot. I have also proved alot of your statements wrong (the NSA cant use CALEA etc). Your last statement is worng to. The NSA is not buying anything unless your implying that American telecoms are makeing monney off the NSA. By definition using the NarusInsight on American soil is domestic spying. Lets call domestic spying, domestic spying. Dont get me wrong I think your imput has made this post better. AbrahamLincoln24 22:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC) Do you agaree if not explain. AbrahamLincoln24 22:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
==Purposed additioin too Gen. Michael V. Hayden strategy for the NSA== AbrahamLincoln24 06:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC) I want to add this to the last line "This same technology is used by the chinnies government to spy and censor on its people." http://narus.com/press/news/index.html AbrahamLincoln24 15:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme AbrahamLincoln24 01:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Im I wrong if so please explain. AbrahamLincoln24 01:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
AbrahamLincoln24 05:52, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Gen. Michael V. Hayden and the NSA have a strategy to shift greater reliance on American industry for the purposes of domestic spying (see Gen. Hayden Statement to Congress - see section 27), EFF class action suit Although Gen. Hayden said at the National Press Club that "As the director, I was the one responsible to ensure that this program was limited in its scope and disciplined in its application" [3], his testimony that, "One senior executive confided that the data management needs we outlined to him were larger than any he had previously seen" Gen. Hayden Statement to Congress - see section 27 before the Joint Inquiry of the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence) indicates that NSA's database was projected to be considerably larger than AT&T's 300 terabyte "Daytona" database of caller information. The NarusInsight is one type of spying hardware, capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime (39,000 DSL lines). After data capture, according to Narus, its software can replay, "streaming media (for example, VoIP), rendering of Web pages, examination of e-mails and the ability to analyze the payload/attachments of e-mail or file transfer protocols" This same technology is used by the chinese government to spy on its people. (see [ [4]]). AbrahamLincoln24 06:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
AbrahamLincoln24 22:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC) I want to add this line to above text. "The NarusInsight is one type of spying hardware, capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime (39,000 DSL lines)or give AT&T the power to monitor all 7,432,000 DSL lines it owns.
It's true that this article is not the place for an extended discussion of the warrantless wiretapping controversy. But the controversy at the Press Club--which, again, was what first brought Hayden to public prominence--was not about the administration's policy, but about whether or not Hayden knew what was in the 4th Amendment.
I have rethought my position that the Kerr quote doesn't belong in the article--I now think it does. The response from Hayden's supporters is that he was talking about what was relevant in the 4th Amendment, not what was actually in the 4th Amendment. I don't personally buy that, but I don't have to buy it--that is the response and it therefore deserves to be in the article. The article should not take sides on which side is right, but present the opposing views.
What should not be in this article is a debate over whether the administration's position on warrantless wiretapping is valid or not--there's a very lengthy article rehearsing the views pro and con on that. Nareek 00:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
If you want to discuss this topic, then in order to consolidate discussion on particular topics, please refer to the Controversial news conference/video; 4th Amendment; warrantless wiretapping disambiguation section to decide whether to continue discussion under the topic 2006 news conference/video: Did MH say that "probable cause" is not in the 4th Amendment or under the topic Warrantless wiretapping DavidForthoffer ( talk) 17:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This page reads pretty good. I'm just interested in this man's military career. The article simply says "Hayden entered active military service in 1969." Being the period of high US involvement in Vietnam, I wonder if anyone here can add something about how/why he received his Bronze Star. Thank you. 210.20.86.85 05:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
May I just say that you have done a great job of keeping this article fair.
I am someone who defends "warrantless surveillance" and I see no way else to spell it out. It is what it is. "domestic spying" on the other hand seems to imply that Americans were being targeted. While this could be debated, its not a fact.
Good job. I only home my contributions are as diligent as yours.
-- Oxcart12 02:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to discuss this topic, then in order to consolidate discussion on particular topics, please refer to the Controversial news conference/video; 4th Amendment; warrantless wiretapping disambiguation section to decide whether to continue discussion under the topic 2006 news conference/video: Did MH say that "probable cause" is not in the 4th Amendment or under the topic Warrantless wiretapping DavidForthoffer ( talk) 17:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
(Removed comment not related to editing the main article. This is not a blog. Edison ( talk) 04:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC))
Well, but Hayden is a German surname. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.94.186.41 ( talk) 13:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 19:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Is there any place in this article for mention of the fact that when he was working at NSA and CIA, his attire (ie, that 4-star general's uniform) was strictly voluntary? That is, he wasn't required by the Air Force to wear his uniform while working for a civilian agency. He couldve worn a suit ( just like everyone else at NSA and CIA), but for some reason, almost Michael Jackson-like, he chose to keep his particular authoritarian look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petzl ( talk • contribs) 00:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Like many of us who served, he wore his uniform because he was proud of it and proud of the people he served with.
76.189.7.215 ( talk) 23:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC) by 27 yr af vet
The Director of NSA (DIRNSA) is always headed by an active duty military officer at least of the pay-grade of O-9. NSA is a Deparment of Defense (DoD) agency and career NSA civilians are DoD employees in addition to the military personnel that serve there. Thus is entirely appropriate and expected that the DIRNSA would wear his uniform, just as the current DIRNSA does and past ones always have.
The CIA is an executive deparment agency outside of the DoD and thus CIA officers are not DoD employees. There are many pictures available with Gen Hayden as Director of the CIA in a civilian suit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.5.18.32 ( talk) 21:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Military assignees at NSA are expected to wear their uniforms. I suppose, though, as head of the Agency, he could have changed the policy, but that would have broken many years of tradition. ArthurAdams ( talk) 17:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
User 74.107.120.210 ( talk · contribs) added {{ POV}} and {{ Weasel}} tags to the article in August 2009 without any discussion. In fact, no-one has ever discussed them. I couldn't see any weasel-wording or obvious POV problems, so I've removed the tags. Any comments? Cheers, CWC 11:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm amazed there's nothing in this article on torture. Hayden was a very vocal -- and explicit -- proponent of maintaining the CIA's policies and practices on torture after Obama was elected. I refer anyone working on this page to the descriptions of meetings and quotations from Hayden included in a new book, Kill or Capture, by Daniel Klaidman (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt), which comes out in a couple of months. -- 184.46.29.102 ( talk) 19:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
His activity within PRISM and KeyStore etc as a whole need additions as this seems to be his pivotal historical value — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blahblahbuenas ( talk • contribs) 07:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Michael Hayden (general). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Someone keeps changing General Hayden's political party affiliation to Republican. I have known him for many years and he tells me that he has never registered as a Republican. During the course of his military career he lived in a number of different locations and registered to vote in several different states. He tells me that if he was asked for party affiliation on his registrations he would always choose Independent. He also tells me that during the course of his voting life he has voted for both Democrat and Republican candidates.
Some in the media have labeled him as a Republican but they are mistaken. Yes, he served most of his most senior positions in a Republican administration but he was appointed DIRNSA by a Democratic president. Furthermore, he served the entirety of his time as DIRNSA and PDDNI and the majority of his time as DCIA as an active duty uniformed military officer. As such, he was totally non-partisan and non-political as is appropriate and required for military members. Since leaving government he has not been particularly active in the political arena. Yes, he has criticized the current administration from time to time but that does not make him a Republican. He has been asked by some Republican candidates to provide them with national security advice and he has agreed to do that. That also does not make him a Republican. He has said that he would no doubt be willing to also do that for Democratic candidates should they ask.
The open letter that he signed on August 9, 2016 along with 49 others opposing Donald Trump was portrayed in the press using the shorthand "50 GOP National Security Experts..." Or "50 Top Republican ..." but a careful reading of the letter makes clear that they do not refer to themselves as Republicans but only say that they have served in Republican administrations. The letter can be found here: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/08/08/us/politics/national-security-letter-trump.html or here: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/08/08/trumpletter.pdf
Citing a variety of media where a journalist refers to General Hayden as a Republican is insufficient. That is the journalist's opinion or hearsay, not proof.
Ldcrank ( talk) 06:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)ldcrank Ldcrank ( talk) 06:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
While the couple of bullet points are at least sourced, the section doesn't present any overall context, it reads like a set of bulletpoints from Mother Jones magazine. Like other DCI profiles of Bush-era apointees the article is decidedly not neutral. So, one Democratic senator said something bad about the nominee. This is one of five or six of the main things we (as encyclopedia readers) want to know about his tenure. This is more important that the dozen nice things the GOP senators said about him BECAUSE??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.76.12 ( talk) 01:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Michael Hayden (general). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 ( talk) 01:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
"He is married to Jeanine Carrier, and they have a daughter and two sons, Margaret, Michael and Liam."
This passage is unsourced in the article. Michael Edison Hayden writes about the Alt-Right, White Nationalists, etc... for Newsweek. 2605:6000:6947:AB00:3466:94E8:8A8C:A1D2 ( talk) 11:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
During an interview on The Late Show:
Stephen Colbert: DO YOU KNOW-- DO YOU KNOW THINGS THAT YOU CAN'T TELL ME THAT I'D BE FASCINATED TO HEAR?
Michael Hayden: YES.
( LAUGHTER ) ( APPLAUSE )
Stephen: DUMB QUESTION. YOU CAN GIVE US EVEN A HINT?
Michael: YOU CAN KEEP A SECRET?
( LAUGHTER ).
Stephen: TURN OFF THE CAMERAS. {mouthed: no don’t}} I CAN KEEP A SECRET.
Michael: ME, TOO.
( LAUGHTER ) ( APPLAUSE )
Stephen: I STEPPED INTO THAT. [1] Samatva ( talk) 22:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Under Gen. Michael V. Hayden the NSA has forced telecom companies to implement massive domestic spying hardware. Even though Gen. Hayden has said at the National Press Club that "As the director, I was the one responsible to ensure that this program was limited in its scope and disciplined in its application." The NarusInsight is one type of domestic spying hardware. Capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime. For reference thats monitoring 39000 DSL lines in realtime for every piece of hardware. After data capture Narus softeware can replay data. What does this mean well according to Narus website "Capabilities include playback of streaming media (for example, VoIP), rendering of Web pages, examination of e-mails and the ability to analyze the payload/attachments of e-mail or file transfer protocols." References: Narus Ltd http://narus.com, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB Transcript: http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/news/2006/intell-060123-dni01.htm www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1564046/posts Hoover's company factsheet: http://www.hoovers.com/narus/--ID__60701--/free-co-factsheet.xhtml Report by bewert: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/8/14724/28476 EFF case against AT&T http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/ AbrahamLincoln24 23:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
yes it meets all these rules. it has no unpublished data. It is very neutral. All fatcs in the post come from reliable references that I site. 69.107.100.9 01:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC) AbrahamLincoln24 01:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme On 17 OCT 2002 Gen. Hayden goes before the Joint Inquiry of the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence basicly to explain were was the NSA durring the Sept 11 acttacts. Durring his testomony he explains his stradegy "Another part of our strategy for nearly three years has been a shift to a greater reliance on American industry (telecom). We have been moving along this path steadily and we have the metrics to show it. As you know, in project GROUNDBREAKER we have already outsourced a significant portion of our information technology so that we can concentrate on mission. We have partnered with academia for our systems engineering. I have met personally with prominent corporate executive officers(AT&T Verizon etc)." Under the CALEA law telecom companies are force to help the NSA. Reference http://intelligence.senate.gov/0210hrg/021017/hayden.pdf AbrahamLincoln24 03:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone have any problems for the post of narus relatting to Gen. Hayden. AbrahamLincoln24 05:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Matarhyme lets try to keep this Civil. Please don't show bias by accussing me of breaking laws and blabbing secrets. As a 29yrd US vetern who had some type of secret cleance know better than most what is secret and what is not. 1.Anything you can find in public record or on a corparate website is not clisified. 2. Maby the word "forced" is to strong of a word I will bend and put "worked with" in my post. 3. This post is totaly relevent because Gen. Hayden has said this program is one of his greatest acomplishments. He has also said "I have met personally with prominent corporate executive officers(AT&T Verizon etc)." 4. My statement CALEA is not wrong. I think tou should read the CALEA law. CALEA law SEC. 102 part (5) "The term `government' means the government of the United States and any agency or instrumentality thereof, the District of Columbia, any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, and any State or political subdivision thereof authorized by law to conduct electronic surveillance." Please lets keep this CIVIL. http://www.askcalea.net/calea.html 69.107.100.9 15:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC) AbrahamLincoln24 15:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
How about this?
Metarhyme 15:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme thank you for working with me. I want to stick with my post. This is what Im trying to convey in my post. I want to give scope and size to Gen. Hayden biggest acomplishment. Using the example of the NarusInsight is one way to do this. I dont want to use any phrase like "questioned his honesty" beacuse he ether miss statted somthing or he did not. AbrahamLincoln24 16:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I cleaned it up - does that suit you? Metarhyme 16:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme please help me combine these 2 post and I think we have a winner. Also correction to grammer would help. AbrahamLincoln24 17:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Narus ST-6400 and NarusInsight by Narus Ltd. Under Gen. Michael V. Hayden the NSA has worked with telecom companies to implement massive domestic spying hardware. Even though Gen. Hayden has said at the National Press Club that "As the director, I was the one responsible to ensure that this program was limited in its scope and disciplined in its application." The NarusInsight is one type of domestic spying hardware. Capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime. For reference thats monitoring 39,000 DSL lines in realtime for every piece of hardware. After data capture Narus softeware can replay data. According to Narus website replay data definition is "Capabilities include playback of streaming media (for example, VoIP), rendering of Web pages, examination of e-mails and the ability to analyze the payload/attachments of e-mail or file transfer protocols." References: Narus Ltd http://narus.com, NATIONAL PRESS CLUB Transcript: http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/news/2006/intell-060123-dni01.htm www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1564046/posts Hoover's company factsheet: http://www.hoovers.com/narus/--ID__60701--/free-co-factsheet.xhtml EFF case against AT&T http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/ http://www.askcalea.net/calea.html
Here's my try at NPOV combo:
Metarhyme 18:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Almost there heres mine... AbrahamLincoln24 21:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC) Perposed titled Gen. Michael V. Hayden strategy for the NSA
Gen. Michael V. Hayden strategy for the NSA
Metarhyme I think I been a sport and bent over backwards. I've taken out the word "massive", even though installing hardware like NarusInsight at evry telecom company is by definition massive. I've taken out the word "forced", even though CALEA law proves it. I've taken out miss statements that Gen. Hayden has said about the domestic spy program and he has made alot. I have also proved alot of your statements wrong (the NSA cant use CALEA etc). Your last statement is worng to. The NSA is not buying anything unless your implying that American telecoms are makeing monney off the NSA. By definition using the NarusInsight on American soil is domestic spying. Lets call domestic spying, domestic spying. Dont get me wrong I think your imput has made this post better. AbrahamLincoln24 22:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC) Do you agaree if not explain. AbrahamLincoln24 22:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
==Purposed additioin too Gen. Michael V. Hayden strategy for the NSA== AbrahamLincoln24 06:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC) I want to add this to the last line "This same technology is used by the chinnies government to spy and censor on its people." http://narus.com/press/news/index.html AbrahamLincoln24 15:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Metarhyme AbrahamLincoln24 01:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Im I wrong if so please explain. AbrahamLincoln24 01:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
AbrahamLincoln24 05:52, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Gen. Michael V. Hayden and the NSA have a strategy to shift greater reliance on American industry for the purposes of domestic spying (see Gen. Hayden Statement to Congress - see section 27), EFF class action suit Although Gen. Hayden said at the National Press Club that "As the director, I was the one responsible to ensure that this program was limited in its scope and disciplined in its application" [3], his testimony that, "One senior executive confided that the data management needs we outlined to him were larger than any he had previously seen" Gen. Hayden Statement to Congress - see section 27 before the Joint Inquiry of the Senate Select Committee On Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence) indicates that NSA's database was projected to be considerably larger than AT&T's 300 terabyte "Daytona" database of caller information. The NarusInsight is one type of spying hardware, capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime (39,000 DSL lines). After data capture, according to Narus, its software can replay, "streaming media (for example, VoIP), rendering of Web pages, examination of e-mails and the ability to analyze the payload/attachments of e-mail or file transfer protocols" This same technology is used by the chinese government to spy on its people. (see [ [4]]). AbrahamLincoln24 06:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
AbrahamLincoln24 22:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC) I want to add this line to above text. "The NarusInsight is one type of spying hardware, capable of monitoring of an OC-192 network line in realtime (39,000 DSL lines)or give AT&T the power to monitor all 7,432,000 DSL lines it owns.
It's true that this article is not the place for an extended discussion of the warrantless wiretapping controversy. But the controversy at the Press Club--which, again, was what first brought Hayden to public prominence--was not about the administration's policy, but about whether or not Hayden knew what was in the 4th Amendment.
I have rethought my position that the Kerr quote doesn't belong in the article--I now think it does. The response from Hayden's supporters is that he was talking about what was relevant in the 4th Amendment, not what was actually in the 4th Amendment. I don't personally buy that, but I don't have to buy it--that is the response and it therefore deserves to be in the article. The article should not take sides on which side is right, but present the opposing views.
What should not be in this article is a debate over whether the administration's position on warrantless wiretapping is valid or not--there's a very lengthy article rehearsing the views pro and con on that. Nareek 00:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
If you want to discuss this topic, then in order to consolidate discussion on particular topics, please refer to the Controversial news conference/video; 4th Amendment; warrantless wiretapping disambiguation section to decide whether to continue discussion under the topic 2006 news conference/video: Did MH say that "probable cause" is not in the 4th Amendment or under the topic Warrantless wiretapping DavidForthoffer ( talk) 17:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This page reads pretty good. I'm just interested in this man's military career. The article simply says "Hayden entered active military service in 1969." Being the period of high US involvement in Vietnam, I wonder if anyone here can add something about how/why he received his Bronze Star. Thank you. 210.20.86.85 05:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
May I just say that you have done a great job of keeping this article fair.
I am someone who defends "warrantless surveillance" and I see no way else to spell it out. It is what it is. "domestic spying" on the other hand seems to imply that Americans were being targeted. While this could be debated, its not a fact.
Good job. I only home my contributions are as diligent as yours.
-- Oxcart12 02:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
If you want to discuss this topic, then in order to consolidate discussion on particular topics, please refer to the Controversial news conference/video; 4th Amendment; warrantless wiretapping disambiguation section to decide whether to continue discussion under the topic 2006 news conference/video: Did MH say that "probable cause" is not in the 4th Amendment or under the topic Warrantless wiretapping DavidForthoffer ( talk) 17:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
(Removed comment not related to editing the main article. This is not a blog. Edison ( talk) 04:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC))
Well, but Hayden is a German surname. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.94.186.41 ( talk) 13:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 19:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Is there any place in this article for mention of the fact that when he was working at NSA and CIA, his attire (ie, that 4-star general's uniform) was strictly voluntary? That is, he wasn't required by the Air Force to wear his uniform while working for a civilian agency. He couldve worn a suit ( just like everyone else at NSA and CIA), but for some reason, almost Michael Jackson-like, he chose to keep his particular authoritarian look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petzl ( talk • contribs) 00:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Like many of us who served, he wore his uniform because he was proud of it and proud of the people he served with.
76.189.7.215 ( talk) 23:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC) by 27 yr af vet
The Director of NSA (DIRNSA) is always headed by an active duty military officer at least of the pay-grade of O-9. NSA is a Deparment of Defense (DoD) agency and career NSA civilians are DoD employees in addition to the military personnel that serve there. Thus is entirely appropriate and expected that the DIRNSA would wear his uniform, just as the current DIRNSA does and past ones always have.
The CIA is an executive deparment agency outside of the DoD and thus CIA officers are not DoD employees. There are many pictures available with Gen Hayden as Director of the CIA in a civilian suit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.5.18.32 ( talk) 21:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Military assignees at NSA are expected to wear their uniforms. I suppose, though, as head of the Agency, he could have changed the policy, but that would have broken many years of tradition. ArthurAdams ( talk) 17:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
User 74.107.120.210 ( talk · contribs) added {{ POV}} and {{ Weasel}} tags to the article in August 2009 without any discussion. In fact, no-one has ever discussed them. I couldn't see any weasel-wording or obvious POV problems, so I've removed the tags. Any comments? Cheers, CWC 11:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm amazed there's nothing in this article on torture. Hayden was a very vocal -- and explicit -- proponent of maintaining the CIA's policies and practices on torture after Obama was elected. I refer anyone working on this page to the descriptions of meetings and quotations from Hayden included in a new book, Kill or Capture, by Daniel Klaidman (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt), which comes out in a couple of months. -- 184.46.29.102 ( talk) 19:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
His activity within PRISM and KeyStore etc as a whole need additions as this seems to be his pivotal historical value — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blahblahbuenas ( talk • contribs) 07:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Michael Hayden (general). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Someone keeps changing General Hayden's political party affiliation to Republican. I have known him for many years and he tells me that he has never registered as a Republican. During the course of his military career he lived in a number of different locations and registered to vote in several different states. He tells me that if he was asked for party affiliation on his registrations he would always choose Independent. He also tells me that during the course of his voting life he has voted for both Democrat and Republican candidates.
Some in the media have labeled him as a Republican but they are mistaken. Yes, he served most of his most senior positions in a Republican administration but he was appointed DIRNSA by a Democratic president. Furthermore, he served the entirety of his time as DIRNSA and PDDNI and the majority of his time as DCIA as an active duty uniformed military officer. As such, he was totally non-partisan and non-political as is appropriate and required for military members. Since leaving government he has not been particularly active in the political arena. Yes, he has criticized the current administration from time to time but that does not make him a Republican. He has been asked by some Republican candidates to provide them with national security advice and he has agreed to do that. That also does not make him a Republican. He has said that he would no doubt be willing to also do that for Democratic candidates should they ask.
The open letter that he signed on August 9, 2016 along with 49 others opposing Donald Trump was portrayed in the press using the shorthand "50 GOP National Security Experts..." Or "50 Top Republican ..." but a careful reading of the letter makes clear that they do not refer to themselves as Republicans but only say that they have served in Republican administrations. The letter can be found here: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/08/08/us/politics/national-security-letter-trump.html or here: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/08/08/trumpletter.pdf
Citing a variety of media where a journalist refers to General Hayden as a Republican is insufficient. That is the journalist's opinion or hearsay, not proof.
Ldcrank ( talk) 06:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)ldcrank Ldcrank ( talk) 06:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
While the couple of bullet points are at least sourced, the section doesn't present any overall context, it reads like a set of bulletpoints from Mother Jones magazine. Like other DCI profiles of Bush-era apointees the article is decidedly not neutral. So, one Democratic senator said something bad about the nominee. This is one of five or six of the main things we (as encyclopedia readers) want to know about his tenure. This is more important that the dozen nice things the GOP senators said about him BECAUSE??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.76.12 ( talk) 01:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Michael Hayden (general). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 ( talk) 01:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
"He is married to Jeanine Carrier, and they have a daughter and two sons, Margaret, Michael and Liam."
This passage is unsourced in the article. Michael Edison Hayden writes about the Alt-Right, White Nationalists, etc... for Newsweek. 2605:6000:6947:AB00:3466:94E8:8A8C:A1D2 ( talk) 11:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
During an interview on The Late Show:
Stephen Colbert: DO YOU KNOW-- DO YOU KNOW THINGS THAT YOU CAN'T TELL ME THAT I'D BE FASCINATED TO HEAR?
Michael Hayden: YES.
( LAUGHTER ) ( APPLAUSE )
Stephen: DUMB QUESTION. YOU CAN GIVE US EVEN A HINT?
Michael: YOU CAN KEEP A SECRET?
( LAUGHTER ).
Stephen: TURN OFF THE CAMERAS. {mouthed: no don’t}} I CAN KEEP A SECRET.
Michael: ME, TOO.
( LAUGHTER ) ( APPLAUSE )
Stephen: I STEPPED INTO THAT. [1] Samatva ( talk) 22:11, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)