This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Glaser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Glaser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
I've added material to the article and supporting citations are ready and will be added very soon.
Chesapeake77 ( talk) 18:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
1) He was a political appointee-- Poets Laureate of Maryland are appointed by the governer-- and political appointees get succession boxes.
2) You left an "edit note"-- saying "awards should be reduced in the Infobox to the most notable ones but then you removed all of them (twice). (Which totals 3 reverts for you-- requiring discussion and no further reverts).
3) I have reduced the awards to those that are the most notable (cutting the total text for awards in half).
4) All remaining awards are bestowed for population areas of 6 million people-- either A) the entire state of Maryland (population 6 million) or B) the entire Washington metropolitan area (6 million people as well).
Therefore the remaining awards are highly notable.
Chesapeake77 >>> ♥ Truth 05:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
|honorific_suffix=
is for: This is for things like OBE – honorifics of serious significance that are attached to the name in formal address, such as national orders and non-honorary doctorates; do not use it for routine things like "BA"(from the template documentation). You are adding a job title which belongs in
|title=
which I did and you reverted. There is no precedent for cramming a "succession box" into this parameter. Such information can be included in {{
infobox office holder}}, but using that template is not appropriate as his career was mostly as a poet/writer. If you insist on a succession box, it should be at the bottom of the article, not in the infobox. But if you look at other poets who were also in his position,
Michael Collier (poet) and
Stanley Plumly for example, his predecessor and successor, there are no succession boxes in those articles which is normal.You keep added the number of grandchildren which is just trivia and doesn't belong in the infobox (it's not even mentioned in the article). You keep adding detailed information on his education. The infobox is for what is most relevant. That would be his MA/Ph.d. The undergraduate degree is a stepping-stone to his graduate degree and doesn't add anything significant. There is no obvious significance of "postdoc studies" and should not be in the infobox.I do not know that any of the awards are that significant as none have WP articles. But trimming this to three is better than before.An infobox is for a quick summary of the most important facts. Details belong in the article.
MB
16:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Glaser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Glaser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
I've added material to the article and supporting citations are ready and will be added very soon.
Chesapeake77 ( talk) 18:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
1) He was a political appointee-- Poets Laureate of Maryland are appointed by the governer-- and political appointees get succession boxes.
2) You left an "edit note"-- saying "awards should be reduced in the Infobox to the most notable ones but then you removed all of them (twice). (Which totals 3 reverts for you-- requiring discussion and no further reverts).
3) I have reduced the awards to those that are the most notable (cutting the total text for awards in half).
4) All remaining awards are bestowed for population areas of 6 million people-- either A) the entire state of Maryland (population 6 million) or B) the entire Washington metropolitan area (6 million people as well).
Therefore the remaining awards are highly notable.
Chesapeake77 >>> ♥ Truth 05:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
|honorific_suffix=
is for: This is for things like OBE – honorifics of serious significance that are attached to the name in formal address, such as national orders and non-honorary doctorates; do not use it for routine things like "BA"(from the template documentation). You are adding a job title which belongs in
|title=
which I did and you reverted. There is no precedent for cramming a "succession box" into this parameter. Such information can be included in {{
infobox office holder}}, but using that template is not appropriate as his career was mostly as a poet/writer. If you insist on a succession box, it should be at the bottom of the article, not in the infobox. But if you look at other poets who were also in his position,
Michael Collier (poet) and
Stanley Plumly for example, his predecessor and successor, there are no succession boxes in those articles which is normal.You keep added the number of grandchildren which is just trivia and doesn't belong in the infobox (it's not even mentioned in the article). You keep adding detailed information on his education. The infobox is for what is most relevant. That would be his MA/Ph.d. The undergraduate degree is a stepping-stone to his graduate degree and doesn't add anything significant. There is no obvious significance of "postdoc studies" and should not be in the infobox.I do not know that any of the awards are that significant as none have WP articles. But trimming this to three is better than before.An infobox is for a quick summary of the most important facts. Details belong in the article.
MB
16:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)