From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 11:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    very good and easy prose
    there should be more information about his religiosity; does he practice Jewish traditions? Or is he more liberal?
    Sources conflict on this point. The "Cammalleri is Jewish" opening line is not my addition but I realize that it isn't going anywhere without an edit war. one source says he observes Jewish holidays. Another says he was raised secular. A third gives no indication of the importance of religion in his life. Lacking a consistent message, I prefer to leave the section as is. Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    the "by whom" tag in the last picture's and the playing style section should be resolved.
    Reworded for clarity. Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply
    high-quality sources
    overall good reference formatting, but the dates were inconsistent, so I changed to classic mdy format.
    I fixed one minor error in one reference
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    no trivia; focused
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    no bias
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    as semi-protected
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    high-quality pictures are properly licensed
  7. Overall: I see you are a WikiCup entrant, and you have only 10 points :/. Sorry for the delay, I was busy, but also a bit lazy :).
    Pass/Fail:
    No worries on the Wikicup. If I was truly dedicated to it this year, I'dve had several articles queued up. Appreciate the review, and hopefully I have addressed your concerns. Thanks! Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 11:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    very good and easy prose
    there should be more information about his religiosity; does he practice Jewish traditions? Or is he more liberal?
    Sources conflict on this point. The "Cammalleri is Jewish" opening line is not my addition but I realize that it isn't going anywhere without an edit war. one source says he observes Jewish holidays. Another says he was raised secular. A third gives no indication of the importance of religion in his life. Lacking a consistent message, I prefer to leave the section as is. Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    the "by whom" tag in the last picture's and the playing style section should be resolved.
    Reworded for clarity. Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply
    high-quality sources
    overall good reference formatting, but the dates were inconsistent, so I changed to classic mdy format.
    I fixed one minor error in one reference
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    no trivia; focused
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    no bias
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    as semi-protected
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    high-quality pictures are properly licensed
  7. Overall: I see you are a WikiCup entrant, and you have only 10 points :/. Sorry for the delay, I was busy, but also a bit lazy :).
    Pass/Fail:
    No worries on the Wikicup. If I was truly dedicated to it this year, I'dve had several articles queued up. Appreciate the review, and hopefully I have addressed your concerns. Thanks! Reso lute 18:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook