![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be moved to Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral or something similar. The current name is a bad and clumsy translation. -- estavisti 00:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I have copy-edited the whole of this article for syntax, style, punctuation, spelling, grammar and typos, but I don't know enough about the subject to do anything with the actual meaning. I have the strong impression that it is highly partisan and that someone who can manage to be NPOV in Serbian affairs, if any such person exists, needs to edit it fairly radically. Woblosch 23:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Removed the tag, since you're pretty vague. I'll go through the article in the coming days and see what's what.-- Methodius 00:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 01:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Article with multiple issues, containing original research without references or refs antagonistic for particular aspect of the article. Usage of Weasel words and phrases is also apparent, with excessive editorializing and some contentious labeling. Article is at times misleading and lacking both in NPOV and sufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject of Montenegrin Orthodox Church unification with Serbian Orthodox Church. Lot of works is needed to improve this one.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 23:33, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
The article either has sources or it does not have sources. There is no need to add {{citation needed}} tags to numerous unreferenced statements in an article when {{unreferenced}} or {{refimprove}} would state equivalent information..-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 06:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 21:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
... not surprisingly at all...part of your above statement? -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 21:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be moved to Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral or something similar. The current name is a bad and clumsy translation. -- estavisti 00:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I have copy-edited the whole of this article for syntax, style, punctuation, spelling, grammar and typos, but I don't know enough about the subject to do anything with the actual meaning. I have the strong impression that it is highly partisan and that someone who can manage to be NPOV in Serbian affairs, if any such person exists, needs to edit it fairly radically. Woblosch 23:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Removed the tag, since you're pretty vague. I'll go through the article in the coming days and see what's what.-- Methodius 00:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 01:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Article with multiple issues, containing original research without references or refs antagonistic for particular aspect of the article. Usage of Weasel words and phrases is also apparent, with excessive editorializing and some contentious labeling. Article is at times misleading and lacking both in NPOV and sufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject of Montenegrin Orthodox Church unification with Serbian Orthodox Church. Lot of works is needed to improve this one.-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 23:33, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
The article either has sources or it does not have sources. There is no need to add {{citation needed}} tags to numerous unreferenced statements in an article when {{unreferenced}} or {{refimprove}} would state equivalent information..-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 06:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
-- ౪ Santa ౪ 99° 21:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
... not surprisingly at all...part of your above statement? -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 21:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)