This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemicals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pharmacology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contest speedy, the subject is notable, it only does not say that, it is already tagged with the {{ importance}}, for further discussion, see the notability wikiproject. -- Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Dirk, after doing a search on Google, I couldn't find ANY information anywhere of how this chemical is notable. After re-reading the notability guidelines, I still see no reason to keep this article. Aervanath 17:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Might be, I've also had a quick look, I do see it has toxicology data available, and it is an isomer of diethylether. But it is indeed not going to be a hugely important compound. -- Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

So does that mean you'll remove the hang-on tag? Or is the data you found notable enough? Aervanath 17:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm in doubt. I'd like to hear the reason why this article was created in the first place as well. My survey was quick, I may have missed something, otherwise I tend to removal of the hangon. -- Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Still not utterly impressed .. but [1]/ [2] - study on radiation of methoxypropane, creates radicals that rearrange. -- Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 21:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

This compound was once used as an anesthetic. It might be more widely known as methyl propyl ether, or by the trade names Neothyl or Metopryl. I'm going to remove the speedy tag and will write up a suitable article shortly. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 21:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Ah, I got a bit a feeling that that was the case from the toxicology study, something about mice going out in combination with a LD50, but was not sure. Cheers! -- Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 21:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Having been shown to be wrong once before in regards to this article, I'm not going to take any more drastic action on my own, but doesn't this article still qualify as a stub? It still doesn't seem all that informative. Aervanath 09:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC) reply

As far as I can see it carries the correct stub templates. Hope to see you around! -- Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Yep, you're right, my mistake! -- Aervanath 12:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC) reply