Metagenomics has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Metagenomics: An Alternative Approach to Genomics page were merged into Metagenomics on 23 February 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I think the subject also need some comments the study of organisms acting as a community. An example being the flow of a metabolite through the different metabolisms. Any thoughts? Or Perhaps that comes under systems biology instead?
It does include an aspect of studying an entire community at a genetic level.
Obviously someone closely with Diversa Corporation has edited this piece. Metagenomics is obviously not only Diversa Corporation !!! I removed Press releases and all mentions to Diversa Corporation in the references. More editing is neeeded.
-- Daniel Vaulot 13:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
It's the first time I've seen the term "chip-based pyrosequencing" being used; the reason it's not used so much is that it could cause confusion with oligo-chips based resequencing, which is a totally different technology which is not used at all in metagenomics. The term is otherwise essentially used in one (solid) paper ("Bacterial flora-typing with targeted, chip-based Pyrosequencing" BMC Microbiology). How would others feel about changing the term "chip-based pyrosequencing" to "massively parallel pyrosequencing"? -- Pascal.hingamp ( talk) 11:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Since CARMA3 has shown to outperform MEGAN and SOrt-ITEMS it should probably also be mentioned, reference here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr225 93.130.46.13 ( talk) 19:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
I saw that this article has been tagged for a while so I went ahead and cleared out the further reading list. I'm going to work through those and use them to build on the framework that exists. This is my first major edit, so corrections, suggestions are welcome. Estevezj ( talk) 05:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Any objection to converting footnotes to list-defined (LDR) format? This many inline citations are getting awkward. Estevezj ( talk) 11:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm wondering what the consensus is regarding what the focus of the bioinformatics section should be. I've been operating under the supposition that the focus should be on the rationales and methods behind commonly used tools rather than a list of those tools (cf. how things used to be). I've taken the Koonin (2008) and Wooley (2010) review articles as my models in reorganizing and expanding this section, and the way they handle the balance between discussing approaches versus software would be my suggestion as to how we should proceed. Estevezj ( talk) 05:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Allens ( talk · contribs) 17:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I believe it passes! Next thing to do is to figure out how to list it...
This article lacks the discussion on sampling techniques, which I believe is quite particular for environmental analysis. I'm thinking to add a section about it and put it together with the sequencing and bioinformatics sections into a "method" section or something similar. -- sentausa ( talk) 08:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Metagenomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
I just came across a page from 2013 called Metagenomics: An Alternative Approach to Genomics. Is there anything salvagable from it to merge in here? Otherwise it can be deleted. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) talk 10:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Metagenomics has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Metagenomics: An Alternative Approach to Genomics page were merged into Metagenomics on 23 February 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I think the subject also need some comments the study of organisms acting as a community. An example being the flow of a metabolite through the different metabolisms. Any thoughts? Or Perhaps that comes under systems biology instead?
It does include an aspect of studying an entire community at a genetic level.
Obviously someone closely with Diversa Corporation has edited this piece. Metagenomics is obviously not only Diversa Corporation !!! I removed Press releases and all mentions to Diversa Corporation in the references. More editing is neeeded.
-- Daniel Vaulot 13:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
It's the first time I've seen the term "chip-based pyrosequencing" being used; the reason it's not used so much is that it could cause confusion with oligo-chips based resequencing, which is a totally different technology which is not used at all in metagenomics. The term is otherwise essentially used in one (solid) paper ("Bacterial flora-typing with targeted, chip-based Pyrosequencing" BMC Microbiology). How would others feel about changing the term "chip-based pyrosequencing" to "massively parallel pyrosequencing"? -- Pascal.hingamp ( talk) 11:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Since CARMA3 has shown to outperform MEGAN and SOrt-ITEMS it should probably also be mentioned, reference here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr225 93.130.46.13 ( talk) 19:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
I saw that this article has been tagged for a while so I went ahead and cleared out the further reading list. I'm going to work through those and use them to build on the framework that exists. This is my first major edit, so corrections, suggestions are welcome. Estevezj ( talk) 05:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Any objection to converting footnotes to list-defined (LDR) format? This many inline citations are getting awkward. Estevezj ( talk) 11:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm wondering what the consensus is regarding what the focus of the bioinformatics section should be. I've been operating under the supposition that the focus should be on the rationales and methods behind commonly used tools rather than a list of those tools (cf. how things used to be). I've taken the Koonin (2008) and Wooley (2010) review articles as my models in reorganizing and expanding this section, and the way they handle the balance between discussing approaches versus software would be my suggestion as to how we should proceed. Estevezj ( talk) 05:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Allens ( talk · contribs) 17:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
I believe it passes! Next thing to do is to figure out how to list it...
This article lacks the discussion on sampling techniques, which I believe is quite particular for environmental analysis. I'm thinking to add a section about it and put it together with the sequencing and bioinformatics sections into a "method" section or something similar. -- sentausa ( talk) 08:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Metagenomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
I just came across a page from 2013 called Metagenomics: An Alternative Approach to Genomics. Is there anything salvagable from it to merge in here? Otherwise it can be deleted. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) talk 10:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)