This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article was nominated for
merging with
Epistemology on 20 July 2007. The result of
the discussion was keep as separate articles.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Sven, Bernecker; Pritchard, Duncan, eds. (2010). "Part X METAEPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES". The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge Philosophy Companions. Routledge.
ISBN978-0-415-96219-3. Might be useful for improving the Epistemological methodology section.
Grajner, Pedro; Schmechtig, eds. (2016). Epistemic Reasons, Norms and Goals. De Gruyter.
ISBN978-3-11-049676-5.
McHugh, Conor; Way, Jonathan; Whiting, Daniel, eds. (2018). Normativity: Epistemic and Practical. Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-875870-9.
Jargon
Unfortunately the reality of the field is that the jargon heavy terminology is required to convey very specific ideas. This is not really something that can be changed without significantly decreasing the content of the article.
DMelvinKaphan (
talk)
03:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article was nominated for
merging with
Epistemology on 20 July 2007. The result of
the discussion was keep as separate articles.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Sven, Bernecker; Pritchard, Duncan, eds. (2010). "Part X METAEPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES". The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge Philosophy Companions. Routledge.
ISBN978-0-415-96219-3. Might be useful for improving the Epistemological methodology section.
Grajner, Pedro; Schmechtig, eds. (2016). Epistemic Reasons, Norms and Goals. De Gruyter.
ISBN978-3-11-049676-5.
McHugh, Conor; Way, Jonathan; Whiting, Daniel, eds. (2018). Normativity: Epistemic and Practical. Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-875870-9.
Jargon
Unfortunately the reality of the field is that the jargon heavy terminology is required to convey very specific ideas. This is not really something that can be changed without significantly decreasing the content of the article.
DMelvinKaphan (
talk)
03:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)reply
