![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The contents of this short article (stub) are already covered almost verbatim in both the T-Mobile USA and AT&T Inc. articles. The content is briefly mentioned again in AT&T Mobility. I think four articles covering the same topic is overkill. This article does not offer any insight or detail that is not present in the main articles. Per WP:MM reasons to merge an article include:
I believe all three apply to this article. I can see no reason why content that is already present at both T-Mobile USA and AT&T Inc. needs to be reproduced a third time (fourth time if counting the brief mention at AT&T Mobility), especially considering the brevity of Merger of AT&T and T-Mobile article. (Additionally, the title of this article is sloppy, implying that AT&T is merging with T-Mobile International AG, when in fact T-Mobile USA is the only DT asset up for sale to AT&T.)
I support the merge of this article into T-Mobile USA and AT&T Inc. articles. What do others think? Ch Th Jo ( talk) 02:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I agree on the title. However, this is quite a discrete topic and definitely of relevance to a large number of readers. At least for now it should stay as a standalone article. Lesbianadvocate ( talk) 18:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Susan Crawford Blog [1] has mentioned that the parties have officially filed with the FCC. Where is a link to it? Lingust ( talk) 14:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
If the article is not merged into T-Mobile USA, I feel that the title should be changed from "Merger of AT&T and T-Mobile USA" to "Acquisition of T-Mobile USA by AT&T," or something reflecting the fact that it is an acquisition/sale rather than a merger. Just a thought. ShandraShazam ( talk) 01:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. I was thinking about to going ahead and doing it, when I noticed that someone else had the same concern. Would the title "Purchase of T-Mobile USA by AT&T" be a better one, or just stick with "Acquisition of..." ??? So, who's going to do it?
LP-mn (
talk)
19:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
DONE.
LP-mn (
talk)
20:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The contents of this short article (stub) are already covered almost verbatim in both the T-Mobile USA and AT&T Inc. articles. The content is briefly mentioned again in AT&T Mobility. I think four articles covering the same topic is overkill. This article does not offer any insight or detail that is not present in the main articles. Per WP:MM reasons to merge an article include:
I believe all three apply to this article. I can see no reason why content that is already present at both T-Mobile USA and AT&T Inc. needs to be reproduced a third time (fourth time if counting the brief mention at AT&T Mobility), especially considering the brevity of Merger of AT&T and T-Mobile article. (Additionally, the title of this article is sloppy, implying that AT&T is merging with T-Mobile International AG, when in fact T-Mobile USA is the only DT asset up for sale to AT&T.)
I support the merge of this article into T-Mobile USA and AT&T Inc. articles. What do others think? Ch Th Jo ( talk) 02:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I agree on the title. However, this is quite a discrete topic and definitely of relevance to a large number of readers. At least for now it should stay as a standalone article. Lesbianadvocate ( talk) 18:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Susan Crawford Blog [1] has mentioned that the parties have officially filed with the FCC. Where is a link to it? Lingust ( talk) 14:53, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
If the article is not merged into T-Mobile USA, I feel that the title should be changed from "Merger of AT&T and T-Mobile USA" to "Acquisition of T-Mobile USA by AT&T," or something reflecting the fact that it is an acquisition/sale rather than a merger. Just a thought. ShandraShazam ( talk) 01:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Agreed. I was thinking about to going ahead and doing it, when I noticed that someone else had the same concern. Would the title "Purchase of T-Mobile USA by AT&T" be a better one, or just stick with "Acquisition of..." ??? So, who's going to do it?
LP-mn (
talk)
19:59, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
DONE.
LP-mn (
talk)
20:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)