This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This seems to be only touristic information and as such should be moved to WikiTravel as per WP:AFDP. Pascal.Tesson 23:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I am not an expert on WP rules, but if the question is does this article contain some encyclopedic value rather than travel value, then I would be inclined to say yes. I was using WP to look at the history of the Island of Nauru and the present day economy, including tourism, and the article certainly helped me in that respect, as it is the islands only hotel. So if you removed it then I would have learnt less on the Nauru economy. Of course, maybe it should be in the Nauru section. Is it poorly writen and a bit of an advertisement, yes, but it still imparts usful information. Anyway, thats my two bobs worth. JL
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Menen Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This seems to be only touristic information and as such should be moved to WikiTravel as per WP:AFDP. Pascal.Tesson 23:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I am not an expert on WP rules, but if the question is does this article contain some encyclopedic value rather than travel value, then I would be inclined to say yes. I was using WP to look at the history of the Island of Nauru and the present day economy, including tourism, and the article certainly helped me in that respect, as it is the islands only hotel. So if you removed it then I would have learnt less on the Nauru economy. Of course, maybe it should be in the Nauru section. Is it poorly writen and a bit of an advertisement, yes, but it still imparts usful information. Anyway, thats my two bobs worth. JL
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Menen Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)