This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article says that in 2016, Members Only collaborated with Nickelodeon to reach Millenials. What? Millenials are in their 30s and probably don't watch much Nick. 165.225.38.81 ( talk) 22:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia "popular culture" sections are rife with poorly referenced examples, but here an example has been cited to a published work of scholarship on popular culture. So please don't remove it. 50.185.134.48 ( talk) 01:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Here's a great new article regarding the history of Members Only that came out recently via Mental Floss. I added a sentence regarding their shift in advertisement to the "popular culture" section. Definitely more worth adding in from this source if anyone is interested in taking a closer look at it. Cheers Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro

I am constantly amazed at the population that tries to make themselves famous by adding pictures of themselves related to topics. 137.118.161.59 ( talk) 11:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC) reply