Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: Rikkizd101 ( talk · contribs) 21:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Esculenta ( talk · contribs) 23:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'll take on this review. I notice some problems immediately: I suggest the nominator have a look at the recommended beetle article structure guideline. Comparing the recommendations to this article, one notices that sections on "Taxonomy and phylogeny" and "Description and identification" are missing; these are part of "broad coverage" criteria aspect of the good article criteria, and the article can't be promoted without them. This species was described more than two centuries ago, so there should be lots of literature that can be used to fill these gaps. Please check the other suggestions in the beetle page too and see if anything's missing. These deficiencies would normally be enough to fail the review, but I understand this is a class project, so I'll give some time to fill the gaps before taking a closer look. Esculenta ( talk) 23:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC) reply

No response from the nominator in seven+ days, so it's time to close this review. Esculenta ( talk) 23:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply