![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi. I've just written a page about the new station in all the papers today. Melbourne doesn't have that many radio stations, much less a direct commercial competitor to the ratings leader 3AW? Shouldn't there be a page about it? Ta.
The name 'Melbourne Talk Radio' is being used without permission of the actual owners of the name. Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd is a wholly owned division of Local Media Pty Ltd, which publishes the weekly Melbourne Observer newspaper (established 1969). Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd, which is officially registered with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, holds the business name registrations for 'Melbourne Talk Radio' and 'Melbourne Talk Radio MTR'.
Melbourne Radio Operations Pty Ltd, which is the joint venture of Macquarie Radio Network Ltd, Sydney, and Pacific Star Network Ltd, does NOT have the permission of Local Media Pty Ltd to use its names. Complaints have been lodged with government authorities about the unauthorised use of the 'Melbourne Talk Radio' brand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 08:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
"irrevelant"? So that is the standard of editing at Wikipedia, huh?
- Ash Long, Director, Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
58.161.17.211 (
talk)
13:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
There is no such word as "irrevelant" Wally, though I can see a use for it. The independent reference you seek is www.radioinfo.com.au You ask for no bias, yet every post I have tried to submit, you have removed. THAT, my friend, is bias. - Ash Long —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 00:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Wally, this is not able keeping you happy. It is about FACTS. Where have I mentioned the word 'courts'? I haven't - that's an assumption made by you. Very unwise. You have eliminated our reference to us DISPUTING your wordage. That is grossly unfair. Wikipedia rules say that "content that violates any copyrights will be deleted". By your own rules, any reference to 'Melboure Talk Radio' should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 04:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
'Go For Moe' says Ash Long is suing MTR. Facts please? 'Go For Moe' gives his judgement that 'Melbourne Talk Radio' cannot be trademarked. Is he/she a trade marks expert? 'Go For Moe' then offers a personal slur about Ash Long who appears on a large range of commercial and community radio stations. Then 'Go For Moe' accuses others of bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 11:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
You keep getting it wrong Moe. My name is Peter Mac. I work at the Observer offices. You are wrong, you say Ash Long is suing over 'Melbourne Talk Radio'. Where did you verify that? The material that has been removed from Wikipedia has been independently published in The Age, Herald Sun, Jocks Journal, Radio Info. Yet a small interest group, some associated with a fringe website, seem intent of slurring an independent small business. The truth will become self-evident.
The page's infobox has been modified to say that the station's format is Right Wing Talkback. It has publicly declared its intentions to "skew to the right of politics" and, according to reliable sources which could easily be referenced, has clearly already done so. But I suspect that description is still going to be a little controversial. HiLo48 ( talk) 07:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've added some material about the pending closure of the MTR radio station, as noted from the Melbourne age. I'm just wondering if someone can please clean it up as I just couldn't work out how to format the reference link properly. Thanks. Whitewater111 ( talk) 02:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this can be done because I am not a legal expert but would adding the last 1 minute and 40 seconds of MTR's last broadcast be allowed to be added onto Wikipedia either as a Referenced link or as a direct link? and if so can it be done under fair use? (Not sure what the Australian equivilent of Fair Use is) and I assume if it is permissible that it would be uploaded to commons.wikipedia.org. If no then have no worries I'll just move along to editing another Wikipedia page. Please let me know, thank you in advance. TheGoofyGolfer ( talk) 20:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Melbourne Talk Radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi. I've just written a page about the new station in all the papers today. Melbourne doesn't have that many radio stations, much less a direct commercial competitor to the ratings leader 3AW? Shouldn't there be a page about it? Ta.
The name 'Melbourne Talk Radio' is being used without permission of the actual owners of the name. Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd is a wholly owned division of Local Media Pty Ltd, which publishes the weekly Melbourne Observer newspaper (established 1969). Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd, which is officially registered with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, holds the business name registrations for 'Melbourne Talk Radio' and 'Melbourne Talk Radio MTR'.
Melbourne Radio Operations Pty Ltd, which is the joint venture of Macquarie Radio Network Ltd, Sydney, and Pacific Star Network Ltd, does NOT have the permission of Local Media Pty Ltd to use its names. Complaints have been lodged with government authorities about the unauthorised use of the 'Melbourne Talk Radio' brand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 08:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
"irrevelant"? So that is the standard of editing at Wikipedia, huh?
- Ash Long, Director, Melbourne Talk Radio Pty Ltd —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
58.161.17.211 (
talk)
13:31, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
There is no such word as "irrevelant" Wally, though I can see a use for it. The independent reference you seek is www.radioinfo.com.au You ask for no bias, yet every post I have tried to submit, you have removed. THAT, my friend, is bias. - Ash Long —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 00:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Wally, this is not able keeping you happy. It is about FACTS. Where have I mentioned the word 'courts'? I haven't - that's an assumption made by you. Very unwise. You have eliminated our reference to us DISPUTING your wordage. That is grossly unfair. Wikipedia rules say that "content that violates any copyrights will be deleted". By your own rules, any reference to 'Melboure Talk Radio' should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 04:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
'Go For Moe' says Ash Long is suing MTR. Facts please? 'Go For Moe' gives his judgement that 'Melbourne Talk Radio' cannot be trademarked. Is he/she a trade marks expert? 'Go For Moe' then offers a personal slur about Ash Long who appears on a large range of commercial and community radio stations. Then 'Go For Moe' accuses others of bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.17.211 ( talk) 11:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
You keep getting it wrong Moe. My name is Peter Mac. I work at the Observer offices. You are wrong, you say Ash Long is suing over 'Melbourne Talk Radio'. Where did you verify that? The material that has been removed from Wikipedia has been independently published in The Age, Herald Sun, Jocks Journal, Radio Info. Yet a small interest group, some associated with a fringe website, seem intent of slurring an independent small business. The truth will become self-evident.
The page's infobox has been modified to say that the station's format is Right Wing Talkback. It has publicly declared its intentions to "skew to the right of politics" and, according to reliable sources which could easily be referenced, has clearly already done so. But I suspect that description is still going to be a little controversial. HiLo48 ( talk) 07:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've added some material about the pending closure of the MTR radio station, as noted from the Melbourne age. I'm just wondering if someone can please clean it up as I just couldn't work out how to format the reference link properly. Thanks. Whitewater111 ( talk) 02:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this can be done because I am not a legal expert but would adding the last 1 minute and 40 seconds of MTR's last broadcast be allowed to be added onto Wikipedia either as a Referenced link or as a direct link? and if so can it be done under fair use? (Not sure what the Australian equivilent of Fair Use is) and I assume if it is permissible that it would be uploaded to commons.wikipedia.org. If no then have no worries I'll just move along to editing another Wikipedia page. Please let me know, thank you in advance. TheGoofyGolfer ( talk) 20:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Melbourne Talk Radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)