All obsolete discussion information on this page or information on this page that has been acted upon has now been moved to here: Talk:Melbourne Storm/Archive 1. This is to avoid this page blowing out in size.
Melbourne Storm has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone please explain why the images for the 2013 jerseys have disappeared?? Can we please have them reinstated, as I am not sure how to do it? Anderch ( talk) 06:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
I have just removed the 2013/2014 jersey images as they are now no longer current. Can someone please create some updated images based on the new design for 2015 as I am not sure how to do it. Thanks! Anderch ( talk) 06:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Image:Melbournestorm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The C of E ( talk · contribs) 14:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I'll review this and my first thought is that the references really need some sorting with lots of bare refs, missing access dates and error messages. These will need to be sorted in order for it to be promoted.:
The refs are the main issues that needs to be cleaned up. Once these have been fixed, I'll take another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! ( talk) 14:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I have applied all suggestions above to get article to Good Article status. Anderch ( talk) 07:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Ok no problem.......I will look into the refs over the next few days... Cheers! Anderch ( talk) 11:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Update . All references have now been checked and links all confirmed. Over the coming days I will fix up the formatting. 03:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
I have now reformatted all the incorrectly formatted refs so now they are more uniform. All refs are verified and links work. Please advise if there is anything else. Anderch ( talk) 04:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Can this talk page be cleaned up? There is info on here that is over 8 years old and nolonger relevant. Can old chats and info can it be deleted? if so how much can be removed? Anderch ( talk) 00:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
New Talk page archive created and all obsolete conversation moved there Anderch ( talk) 04:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melbourne Storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
In case anyone is ever updating the history sections or want to know what the titles in the corporate structure of the club was in the early days:
All obsolete discussion information on this page or information on this page that has been acted upon has now been moved to here: Talk:Melbourne Storm/Archive 1. This is to avoid this page blowing out in size.
Melbourne Storm has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone please explain why the images for the 2013 jerseys have disappeared?? Can we please have them reinstated, as I am not sure how to do it? Anderch ( talk) 06:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
I have just removed the 2013/2014 jersey images as they are now no longer current. Can someone please create some updated images based on the new design for 2015 as I am not sure how to do it. Thanks! Anderch ( talk) 06:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Image:Melbournestorm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: The C of E ( talk · contribs) 14:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I'll review this and my first thought is that the references really need some sorting with lots of bare refs, missing access dates and error messages. These will need to be sorted in order for it to be promoted.:
The refs are the main issues that needs to be cleaned up. Once these have been fixed, I'll take another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! ( talk) 14:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I have applied all suggestions above to get article to Good Article status. Anderch ( talk) 07:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Ok no problem.......I will look into the refs over the next few days... Cheers! Anderch ( talk) 11:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Update . All references have now been checked and links all confirmed. Over the coming days I will fix up the formatting. 03:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
I have now reformatted all the incorrectly formatted refs so now they are more uniform. All refs are verified and links work. Please advise if there is anything else. Anderch ( talk) 04:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Can this talk page be cleaned up? There is info on here that is over 8 years old and nolonger relevant. Can old chats and info can it be deleted? if so how much can be removed? Anderch ( talk) 00:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
New Talk page archive created and all obsolete conversation moved there Anderch ( talk) 04:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melbourne Storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
In case anyone is ever updating the history sections or want to know what the titles in the corporate structure of the club was in the early days: