![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The following is an entirely unsupported assertion:
No evidence is advanced that "Most of the criticism" was about job losses rather than "the curriculum itself". That is purely an OPINION. Please add "needs citation" or change! 115.64.132.182 ( talk) 05:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 04:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Melbourne Curriculum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | The request to rename this article to Melbourne Model has been carried out. |
Melbourne Curriculum → Melbourne Model – The article was originally created at this title, indeed, most of the mentions within the article itself are to the "Melbourne Model". The user who moved, Unicomms-wiki, made several such "official" edits and has since been blocked for a username which appears to represent the university. Per WP:COMMONNAME this page should be back where it began. Most of the citations in this article use Melbourne Model as their term. Recent coverage here and here calls it the "Melbourne Model", and the mover's argument about "official terminology" seems defunct anyway as the university's website calls it the Melbourne Model too. Triptothecottage ( talk) 10:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melbourne Model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The following is an entirely unsupported assertion:
No evidence is advanced that "Most of the criticism" was about job losses rather than "the curriculum itself". That is purely an OPINION. Please add "needs citation" or change! 115.64.132.182 ( talk) 05:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 04:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Melbourne Curriculum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | The request to rename this article to Melbourne Model has been carried out. |
Melbourne Curriculum → Melbourne Model – The article was originally created at this title, indeed, most of the mentions within the article itself are to the "Melbourne Model". The user who moved, Unicomms-wiki, made several such "official" edits and has since been blocked for a username which appears to represent the university. Per WP:COMMONNAME this page should be back where it began. Most of the citations in this article use Melbourne Model as their term. Recent coverage here and here calls it the "Melbourne Model", and the mover's argument about "official terminology" seems defunct anyway as the university's website calls it the Melbourne Model too. Triptothecottage ( talk) 10:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melbourne Model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)