GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Ganesha811 ( talk · contribs) 01:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. I see the first review did not get finished. Thanks for your patience in waiting for someone to pick this up!
—Ganesha811 (
talk)
01:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
|
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
|
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
|
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Response to the 1a feedback:
It's not clear either in the lead or the body whether his 1938 candidacy was successful. I presume it was not, but clarification in the text is needed.
Was the kuttab distinguishable in any way? Could we say "local" kuttab or similar?
Is Ruşdiye a particular high school, or a type of education? Clarify in text. Probably "graduated" instead of "finished" would be clearer.
"where he was regarded as one of the best students." needs a citation
"Al Jewhar al asna fi tarajim 'ulama' wa shu'ra' al-Bosna" - was this a thesis or something else? Clarify.
"Muslim Brotherhood or Young Muslims" do we not know which, or do you mean both?
"he engaged other fields of work in Islamic associations" What does this mean? Unclear.
"Higher Islamic School" - where was this? Is this a specific school or a description?
"representing the 'ilmiyya (body of Ulama) to becoming the leading organization of the revivalist movement meant to encompass all Muslims of Bosnia" does this mean that it started out as an academic movement and became a popular movement? Clarify.
"published by El-Hidaje, created a basic contour of Bosniak nationalism" published when?
What was the "routine medical operation" supposed to be for? Do we know?
I presume since there is no mention, that Handzic never had a family/children?
VR talk 17:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content". Presumably non-US copyright tags should suffice for that? VR talk 02:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Ganesha811 ( talk · contribs) 01:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. I see the first review did not get finished. Thanks for your patience in waiting for someone to pick this up!
—Ganesha811 (
talk)
01:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
|
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
|
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
|
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
|
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
Response to the 1a feedback:
It's not clear either in the lead or the body whether his 1938 candidacy was successful. I presume it was not, but clarification in the text is needed.
Was the kuttab distinguishable in any way? Could we say "local" kuttab or similar?
Is Ruşdiye a particular high school, or a type of education? Clarify in text. Probably "graduated" instead of "finished" would be clearer.
"where he was regarded as one of the best students." needs a citation
"Al Jewhar al asna fi tarajim 'ulama' wa shu'ra' al-Bosna" - was this a thesis or something else? Clarify.
"Muslim Brotherhood or Young Muslims" do we not know which, or do you mean both?
"he engaged other fields of work in Islamic associations" What does this mean? Unclear.
"Higher Islamic School" - where was this? Is this a specific school or a description?
"representing the 'ilmiyya (body of Ulama) to becoming the leading organization of the revivalist movement meant to encompass all Muslims of Bosnia" does this mean that it started out as an academic movement and became a popular movement? Clarify.
"published by El-Hidaje, created a basic contour of Bosniak nationalism" published when?
What was the "routine medical operation" supposed to be for? Do we know?
I presume since there is no mention, that Handzic never had a family/children?
VR talk 17:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content". Presumably non-US copyright tags should suffice for that? VR talk 02:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)