Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: liquidluck✽ talk 04:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
At first glance, the article looks close to GA level. While the nominator isn't a major contributor, I'll accept the talk page note as notification. The article passes the quick fail criteria (it looks like the quote discussion has been resolved, and there's been no major edits to the article in a week), so give me a few days to look the article over and compile my review. liquidluck✽ talk 04:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
<ref name="bbc">www.bbc.co.uk</ref>
is in place, but rather than simply using <ref name="bbc" />
the next time the site is referenced, the entire citation (<ref name="bbc">www.bbc.co.uk</ref>
) is given again.
The following sources also appear unreliable:
There are too many problematic citations to justify moving on just yet. The ten unreliable-looking links, seven IMDB links, and seven dead links alone come to twenty-four reference issues. Since this is an article on a living person, I'm setting a dead line of March 2, 2010 for the broken/unreliable links and March 4, 2010 for the formatting issues. If the issues are fixed before then, leave me a note my talk page. liquidluck✽ talk 07:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
As no effort has been made to fix the reference issues I have noted above, I am failing this article. Before nominating the article again, please fix the reference issues, review the GA criteria, and perhaps try a peer review. I'll also leave a few comments on the article's content in a little while. liquidluck✽ talk 03:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Quick content review, since I failed the article due to its references. It isn't very thorough, but it is a start:
Good luck! liquidluck✽ talk 04:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: liquidluck✽ talk 04:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
At first glance, the article looks close to GA level. While the nominator isn't a major contributor, I'll accept the talk page note as notification. The article passes the quick fail criteria (it looks like the quote discussion has been resolved, and there's been no major edits to the article in a week), so give me a few days to look the article over and compile my review. liquidluck✽ talk 04:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
<ref name="bbc">www.bbc.co.uk</ref>
is in place, but rather than simply using <ref name="bbc" />
the next time the site is referenced, the entire citation (<ref name="bbc">www.bbc.co.uk</ref>
) is given again.
The following sources also appear unreliable:
There are too many problematic citations to justify moving on just yet. The ten unreliable-looking links, seven IMDB links, and seven dead links alone come to twenty-four reference issues. Since this is an article on a living person, I'm setting a dead line of March 2, 2010 for the broken/unreliable links and March 4, 2010 for the formatting issues. If the issues are fixed before then, leave me a note my talk page. liquidluck✽ talk 07:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
As no effort has been made to fix the reference issues I have noted above, I am failing this article. Before nominating the article again, please fix the reference issues, review the GA criteria, and perhaps try a peer review. I'll also leave a few comments on the article's content in a little while. liquidluck✽ talk 03:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Quick content review, since I failed the article due to its references. It isn't very thorough, but it is a start:
Good luck! liquidluck✽ talk 04:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)