This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
dinosaurs and
dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Copyright???
Where the heck on Paleofile does it say that it's all CC?
Lythronaxargestes (
talk) 01:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
No where. Basically the entire article is fictional based on some non-existent remains of the taxon (which is only based on a tooth).
IJReiddiscuss 08:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
I believe that Yewtharaptor, the creator of the article, is a long standing issue on the wiki
FunkMonk?
IJReiddiscuss 09:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
It's a "species article" too, so I think it should just be redirected to
Megalosaurus immediately.
FunkMonk (
talk) 15:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
TRUE Information and Images
The article shows the first taxon considered a Dinosaur, found on Poland. Now the false information is out.
There are still no inline citations. If this is not fixed soon, I will redirect the article to
Megalosaurus. Though it should actually be redirected in nay case.
FunkMonk (
talk) 19:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)reply
See it as a preliminar version. At the end of this week it will be fixed. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yewtharaptor (
talk •
contribs) 23:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Several edits where just hidden because they were copyright violations, so that settles it; the article has been redirected. If you want to add sourced, non plagiarised text, do it in the Megalosaurus article, where this taxon is already discussed.
FunkMonk (
talk) 09:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
dinosaurs and
dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Copyright???
Where the heck on Paleofile does it say that it's all CC?
Lythronaxargestes (
talk) 01:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
No where. Basically the entire article is fictional based on some non-existent remains of the taxon (which is only based on a tooth).
IJReiddiscuss 08:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
I believe that Yewtharaptor, the creator of the article, is a long standing issue on the wiki
FunkMonk?
IJReiddiscuss 09:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
It's a "species article" too, so I think it should just be redirected to
Megalosaurus immediately.
FunkMonk (
talk) 15:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)reply
TRUE Information and Images
The article shows the first taxon considered a Dinosaur, found on Poland. Now the false information is out.
There are still no inline citations. If this is not fixed soon, I will redirect the article to
Megalosaurus. Though it should actually be redirected in nay case.
FunkMonk (
talk) 19:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)reply
See it as a preliminar version. At the end of this week it will be fixed. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Yewtharaptor (
talk •
contribs) 23:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Several edits where just hidden because they were copyright violations, so that settles it; the article has been redirected. If you want to add sourced, non plagiarised text, do it in the Megalosaurus article, where this taxon is already discussed.
FunkMonk (
talk) 09:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)reply