From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright???

Where the heck on Paleofile does it say that it's all CC? Lythronaxargestes ( talk) 01:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply

No where. Basically the entire article is fictional based on some non-existent remains of the taxon (which is only based on a tooth). IJReid  discuss 08:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply
I believe that Yewtharaptor, the creator of the article, is a long standing issue on the wiki FunkMonk? IJReid  discuss 09:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply
It's a "species article" too, so I think it should just be redirected to Megalosaurus immediately. FunkMonk ( talk) 15:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply

TRUE Information and Images

The article shows the first taxon considered a Dinosaur, found on Poland. Now the false information is out.

There are still no inline citations. If this is not fixed soon, I will redirect the article to Megalosaurus. Though it should actually be redirected in nay case. FunkMonk ( talk) 19:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply
See it as a preliminar version. At the end of this week it will be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor ( talkcontribs) 23:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Several edits where just hidden because they were copyright violations, so that settles it; the article has been redirected. If you want to add sourced, non plagiarised text, do it in the Megalosaurus article, where this taxon is already discussed. FunkMonk ( talk) 09:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright???

Where the heck on Paleofile does it say that it's all CC? Lythronaxargestes ( talk) 01:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply

No where. Basically the entire article is fictional based on some non-existent remains of the taxon (which is only based on a tooth). IJReid  discuss 08:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply
I believe that Yewtharaptor, the creator of the article, is a long standing issue on the wiki FunkMonk? IJReid  discuss 09:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply
It's a "species article" too, so I think it should just be redirected to Megalosaurus immediately. FunkMonk ( talk) 15:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC) reply

TRUE Information and Images

The article shows the first taxon considered a Dinosaur, found on Poland. Now the false information is out.

There are still no inline citations. If this is not fixed soon, I will redirect the article to Megalosaurus. Though it should actually be redirected in nay case. FunkMonk ( talk) 19:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply
See it as a preliminar version. At the end of this week it will be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor ( talkcontribs) 23:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Several edits where just hidden because they were copyright violations, so that settles it; the article has been redirected. If you want to add sourced, non plagiarised text, do it in the Megalosaurus article, where this taxon is already discussed. FunkMonk ( talk) 09:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook