This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move back to Megalosauroidea? J. Spencer ( talk) 23:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Neither the article about Sciurumimus nor this article account for its position in the phylogeny. This animal's feathers make it of particular import. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.252.226 ( talk) 08:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm following what the article on Sciurumimus says and removing it from the taxobox here for now, should it be recovered as a megalosauroid for good then feel free to re-instate it into the taxobox. For now, though, I guess we should follow current sources unless they've been debunked, in which case the next most recent reliable source could be used. Also, the recent edits under "38.112.87.6" on Commons were me, just so we all know. Dromaeosaurus is best dinosaur ( talk) 15:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move back to Megalosauroidea? J. Spencer ( talk) 23:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Neither the article about Sciurumimus nor this article account for its position in the phylogeny. This animal's feathers make it of particular import. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.252.226 ( talk) 08:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm following what the article on Sciurumimus says and removing it from the taxobox here for now, should it be recovered as a megalosauroid for good then feel free to re-instate it into the taxobox. For now, though, I guess we should follow current sources unless they've been debunked, in which case the next most recent reliable source could be used. Also, the recent edits under "38.112.87.6" on Commons were me, just so we all know. Dromaeosaurus is best dinosaur ( talk) 15:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)