![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is certainly not enough information unique to each species to justify splitting each one off. As is standard for extinct creatures in this instance, we should split only to genus level. User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 05:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi I tried to remove a duplication of a reference but the bot undid it. The bot is suggesting Chelonian Research Monographs is a book, it is not it is a journal, second the ref is already cited under the authors (reference 1) listing the same ref twice seems overkill, also refs are usually done by author not editor. The ref the bot is tring to add is inorrectly formated. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 17:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is certainly not enough information unique to each species to justify splitting each one off. As is standard for extinct creatures in this instance, we should split only to genus level. User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 05:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi I tried to remove a duplication of a reference but the bot undid it. The bot is suggesting Chelonian Research Monographs is a book, it is not it is a journal, second the ref is already cited under the authors (reference 1) listing the same ref twice seems overkill, also refs are usually done by author not editor. The ref the bot is tring to add is inorrectly formated. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 17:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)