![]() | Megafauna was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 23, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Megafauna article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The captions for Macrauchenia, Paraceratherium, Megalodon, Muskoxen and Great White Shark (Maybe also Archaeoindris and Giant Squid) all feature more information in their image captions than the rest of the species, which seems irrelevant to this article as well as to the gallery itself. Separately, there is also inconsistency with the use of "The" before animal names in the captions ("The Greater rhea" and "Bengal Tigers", for example), mostly in the extant category. I am unsure if this is correct or not, but it is jarring to read. T-jaguar-T ( talk) 04:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs) 21:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: The Morrison Man ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be taking a look at this article over the next few days. Comments should be ready soon.
The Morrison Man (
talk)
22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
![]() | Megafauna was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 23, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Megafauna article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The captions for Macrauchenia, Paraceratherium, Megalodon, Muskoxen and Great White Shark (Maybe also Archaeoindris and Giant Squid) all feature more information in their image captions than the rest of the species, which seems irrelevant to this article as well as to the gallery itself. Separately, there is also inconsistency with the use of "The" before animal names in the captions ("The Greater rhea" and "Bengal Tigers", for example), mostly in the extant category. I am unsure if this is correct or not, but it is jarring to read. T-jaguar-T ( talk) 04:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs) 21:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: The Morrison Man ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be taking a look at this article over the next few days. Comments should be ready soon.
The Morrison Man (
talk)
22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|