From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Inconsistency in Gallery Captions

The captions for Macrauchenia, Paraceratherium, Megalodon, Muskoxen and Great White Shark (Maybe also Archaeoindris and Giant Squid) all feature more information in their image captions than the rest of the species, which seems irrelevant to this article as well as to the gallery itself. Separately, there is also inconsistency with the use of "The" before animal names in the captions ("The Greater rhea" and "Bengal Tigers", for example), mostly in the extant category. I am unsure if this is correct or not, but it is jarring to read. T-jaguar-T ( talk) 04:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Megafauna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs) 21:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: The Morrison Man ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reply


Hi, I'll be taking a look at this article over the next few days. Comments should be ready soon. The Morrison Man ( talk) 22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Inconsistency in Gallery Captions

The captions for Macrauchenia, Paraceratherium, Megalodon, Muskoxen and Great White Shark (Maybe also Archaeoindris and Giant Squid) all feature more information in their image captions than the rest of the species, which seems irrelevant to this article as well as to the gallery itself. Separately, there is also inconsistency with the use of "The" before animal names in the captions ("The Greater rhea" and "Bengal Tigers", for example), mostly in the extant category. I am unsure if this is correct or not, but it is jarring to read. T-jaguar-T ( talk) 04:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Megafauna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Wolverine XI ( talk · contribs) 21:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: The Morrison Man ( talk · contribs) 22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reply


Hi, I'll be taking a look at this article over the next few days. Comments should be ready soon. The Morrison Man ( talk) 22:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook