GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Canadian Paul ( talk · contribs) 15:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article in the near future, most likely tomorrow. Canadian Paul 15:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
A very nice article, my only concern is that the second paragraph under Development doesn't flow very well; it's a bit choppy and jumps from fact to fact, making it difficult to read/follow. Is there anything that can be done to improve that?
Other than that, this article is more than ready for GA status. I'll be checking this page at least daily, unless something comes up, so you can be sure I'll notice any comments left here. Canadian Paul 16:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Canadian Paul ( talk · contribs) 15:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article in the near future, most likely tomorrow. Canadian Paul 15:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
A very nice article, my only concern is that the second paragraph under Development doesn't flow very well; it's a bit choppy and jumps from fact to fact, making it difficult to read/follow. Is there anything that can be done to improve that?
Other than that, this article is more than ready for GA status. I'll be checking this page at least daily, unless something comes up, so you can be sure I'll notice any comments left here. Canadian Paul 16:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)