![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is another interesting marian title called reparatrix, which refers to Mary's supposed liturgical role. [1] ADM ( talk) 14:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
The opening of the article states that "That Mary is Mediatrix of graces at a level higher than the mediation of other saints is accepted without question in the Catholic Church".. is this true? I am Catholic and I believe it, but the Church has not declared it dogma, so would it not be open to question then? Either way, I don't think that statement is worded well. -- Willthacheerleader18 ( talk) 00:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry, it is not a dogma yet. Please see refs 20 ans 21 in the article and Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici the "petition" that many people are signing to convince the pope to declare it a dogma. Long after all that 500 bishops sent this letter to ask for a dogma. JP-II did not agree. And Benedict has not accepted yet. History2007 ( talk) 01:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Dogmas do not get defined that way in encyclicals - there are hoops to jump through for the pope. Please read the letter, they want both coredemp and mediatrix.
And many books published long after that encyclical do not list it as a dogma. I am sure. History2007 ( talk) 02:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry but if the Mediatrix is included in the official index of Catholic dogma, which the Enhiridon Symbolorum is, than it is dogma. Oct13
Moreover, the Second Vatican Council defined Mary as Mediatrix in the dogmatic constitution. So the matter is closed. ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
I'll take that bet. But more importantly, what other article's talk page? Oct13 ( talk) 02:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Unnecessary section. Hundreds of Marian apparitions and other private revelations refer to Mary as the Mediatrix and mention her share in Christ's meditation. To name but a few: Fr. Gobbi's alleged locutions, the private revelations in the "Secret of the Rosary" book, and of course the Lady of all Nations apparitions.
Check out Portal:Private revelation to learn more. Oct13 ( talk) 22:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Esoglou the HeartyBowl1989 edits seem to have made a mess of things, as usual. The account and its other reincarnation as Tomlin... have now been blocked again. But this article is getting death by a thousand edits now as these puppets leave a series of train wrecks. I have not even checked what has happened. Could you perhaps revert to one of your own versions from a month ago, and then re-add anything new that is essential? That may be the only way to recover. Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 13:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mediatrix. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is another interesting marian title called reparatrix, which refers to Mary's supposed liturgical role. [1] ADM ( talk) 14:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
The opening of the article states that "That Mary is Mediatrix of graces at a level higher than the mediation of other saints is accepted without question in the Catholic Church".. is this true? I am Catholic and I believe it, but the Church has not declared it dogma, so would it not be open to question then? Either way, I don't think that statement is worded well. -- Willthacheerleader18 ( talk) 00:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry, it is not a dogma yet. Please see refs 20 ans 21 in the article and Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici the "petition" that many people are signing to convince the pope to declare it a dogma. Long after all that 500 bishops sent this letter to ask for a dogma. JP-II did not agree. And Benedict has not accepted yet. History2007 ( talk) 01:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Dogmas do not get defined that way in encyclicals - there are hoops to jump through for the pope. Please read the letter, they want both coredemp and mediatrix.
And many books published long after that encyclical do not list it as a dogma. I am sure. History2007 ( talk) 02:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry but if the Mediatrix is included in the official index of Catholic dogma, which the Enhiridon Symbolorum is, than it is dogma. Oct13
Moreover, the Second Vatican Council defined Mary as Mediatrix in the dogmatic constitution. So the matter is closed. ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
I'll take that bet. But more importantly, what other article's talk page? Oct13 ( talk) 02:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Unnecessary section. Hundreds of Marian apparitions and other private revelations refer to Mary as the Mediatrix and mention her share in Christ's meditation. To name but a few: Fr. Gobbi's alleged locutions, the private revelations in the "Secret of the Rosary" book, and of course the Lady of all Nations apparitions.
Check out Portal:Private revelation to learn more. Oct13 ( talk) 22:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Esoglou the HeartyBowl1989 edits seem to have made a mess of things, as usual. The account and its other reincarnation as Tomlin... have now been blocked again. But this article is getting death by a thousand edits now as these puppets leave a series of train wrecks. I have not even checked what has happened. Could you perhaps revert to one of your own versions from a month ago, and then re-add anything new that is essential? That may be the only way to recover. Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 13:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mediatrix. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)