![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It very interesting that in page with software information are added such chapters like Certifications, 2 direct links to web-site and the page is written using " It is best known for its...". May be user tesimonials should be also published? :( See history of this page. Where is it "best" known? Who decides it? The page is written by author & seller of this software. And I dislike it. Author & seller ever doesn't create own page, no information is available about him. And only one page was published. Wiki should not be a place for ads. Alexeysim06 11:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Alexey: what the program is known for is clear from the listed independent reviews. Some of these features are also listed on the Wikipedia page Comparison of statistical packages. For the certification see [ The list of applications that have earned the "Certified for Windows Vista" logo]. Today only 118 companies have obtained the Certified for Vista logo for one or more of their products, so this is probably a fact worth mentioning. Frank 11:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Medcalcscreenshot.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 08:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL
I have added several references which are neutral and show notability. Frank1848 ( talk) 14:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It very interesting that in page with software information are added such chapters like Certifications, 2 direct links to web-site and the page is written using " It is best known for its...". May be user tesimonials should be also published? :( See history of this page. Where is it "best" known? Who decides it? The page is written by author & seller of this software. And I dislike it. Author & seller ever doesn't create own page, no information is available about him. And only one page was published. Wiki should not be a place for ads. Alexeysim06 11:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Alexey: what the program is known for is clear from the listed independent reviews. Some of these features are also listed on the Wikipedia page Comparison of statistical packages. For the certification see [ The list of applications that have earned the "Certified for Windows Vista" logo]. Today only 118 companies have obtained the Certified for Vista logo for one or more of their products, so this is probably a fact worth mentioning. Frank 11:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Medcalcscreenshot.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 08:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL
I have added several references which are neutral and show notability. Frank1848 ( talk) 14:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)