 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
In this context, "mechanical" is kind of a translation of ancient Greek banausos... AnonMoos ( talk) 17:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Most of this article's content is already in the A Midsummer Night's Dream article. This article contains no real sources (only the play itself). I see no benefit of this stand-alone article unless it were substantially expanded. Thoughts? — Henry chianski ( talk) 18:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I say there's room for a separate overview article, cf. the articles on the individual characters (like Snug, the one with the least sources available, I think). They are usually (and most prolifically, in terms of available sources) discussed as a group. On the other hand, a fully expanded version of this article might make apposite the question of whether the character articles should be merged here. But as I said, not until this article is fully expanded. -- Xover ( talk) 20:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Honestly I agree with it staying here, but I think it should have a bit more detail to it. ( BenC665 ( talk) 14:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC))
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
In this context, "mechanical" is kind of a translation of ancient Greek banausos... AnonMoos ( talk) 17:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Most of this article's content is already in the A Midsummer Night's Dream article. This article contains no real sources (only the play itself). I see no benefit of this stand-alone article unless it were substantially expanded. Thoughts? — Henry chianski ( talk) 18:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I say there's room for a separate overview article, cf. the articles on the individual characters (like Snug, the one with the least sources available, I think). They are usually (and most prolifically, in terms of available sources) discussed as a group. On the other hand, a fully expanded version of this article might make apposite the question of whether the character articles should be merged here. But as I said, not until this article is fully expanded. -- Xover ( talk) 20:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Honestly I agree with it staying here, but I think it should have a bit more detail to it. ( BenC665 ( talk) 14:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC))