This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Meat tax article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Some articles hint that meat (and other dairy products) taxing would reduce GHG emissions far lower than carbon taxes would (cabon taxes being taxes only on fuels). For instance, the PETA article mentioned that "A University of Chicago study even showed that you can reduce your carbon footprint more effectively by going vegan than by switching from a conventional car to a hybrid."
Also, the figures mentioned here (which I found via a treehugger article) look impressive.
Perhaps we can compare the 2 taxes briefly in this article ? It shouldn't be a competition since both taxes are obviously best implemented, but I think it's important to have a brief comparison.
KVDP ( talk) 17:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Although there are no meat taxes levied by countries yet, it seems like each country government will be free to decide what to do with the revenue of the carbon tax. So, it would be entirely possible that the revenue is used for pointless activities (i.e. in Denmark, carbon tax money collected from the tax goes to "research for alternative energy resources"), and in some cases it could go even to activities that damage the environment (i.e. building more roads, unnecessary infrastructure, ...).
Revenue of the carbon tax should, at least partly, be used to completely offset the amount of carbon on which the tax is levied.
I would assume that I'm not the only one that thinks that, so perhaps this can be implemented in the article somewhere. KVDP ( talk) 07:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meat tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Meat tax article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Some articles hint that meat (and other dairy products) taxing would reduce GHG emissions far lower than carbon taxes would (cabon taxes being taxes only on fuels). For instance, the PETA article mentioned that "A University of Chicago study even showed that you can reduce your carbon footprint more effectively by going vegan than by switching from a conventional car to a hybrid."
Also, the figures mentioned here (which I found via a treehugger article) look impressive.
Perhaps we can compare the 2 taxes briefly in this article ? It shouldn't be a competition since both taxes are obviously best implemented, but I think it's important to have a brief comparison.
KVDP ( talk) 17:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Although there are no meat taxes levied by countries yet, it seems like each country government will be free to decide what to do with the revenue of the carbon tax. So, it would be entirely possible that the revenue is used for pointless activities (i.e. in Denmark, carbon tax money collected from the tax goes to "research for alternative energy resources"), and in some cases it could go even to activities that damage the environment (i.e. building more roads, unnecessary infrastructure, ...).
Revenue of the carbon tax should, at least partly, be used to completely offset the amount of carbon on which the tax is levied.
I would assume that I'm not the only one that thinks that, so perhaps this can be implemented in the article somewhere. KVDP ( talk) 07:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meat tax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)