GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Nominator: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 11:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Tim riley ( talk · contribs) 12:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure what this fine article is doing as a mere GAN: to my mind it has FAC written all over it. But either at GA or FA level it needs to be in a single variety of English, and at present it is a mish-mash of BrE and AmE: fibres and behaviours -v- fiber and behavior, and so on. At first glance I think AmE spelling predominates, but whether you go nap on that or on BrE (and I don't imagine anyone will quibble about WP:ENGVAR whichever you go for) you really ought to stick with one or the other. Over to you for now. I hardly think we need put the review formally on hold (unless you'd prefer it.) Must go: I feel a bacon butty coming on. Tim riley talk 12:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria In my judgment this article would be a worthy candidate for WP:FAC.
A shoo-in for GA. On to FAC I hope. Tim riley talk 13:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Nominator: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 11:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Tim riley ( talk · contribs) 12:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure what this fine article is doing as a mere GAN: to my mind it has FAC written all over it. But either at GA or FA level it needs to be in a single variety of English, and at present it is a mish-mash of BrE and AmE: fibres and behaviours -v- fiber and behavior, and so on. At first glance I think AmE spelling predominates, but whether you go nap on that or on BrE (and I don't imagine anyone will quibble about WP:ENGVAR whichever you go for) you really ought to stick with one or the other. Over to you for now. I hardly think we need put the review formally on hold (unless you'd prefer it.) Must go: I feel a bacon butty coming on. Tim riley talk 12:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria In my judgment this article would be a worthy candidate for WP:FAC.
A shoo-in for GA. On to FAC I hope. Tim riley talk 13:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)