This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The Evaluation Engineering article on how to accurately measure bandwidth is an irrelevant reference I will remove it within 48hrs. Kendirangu 15:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I think the section "Kibi, mebi, gibi, tebi, and pebi prefixes", while interesting is not exactly on topic. The section "Nomenclature" neatly summarises kilo vs kibi differences. Would not a link to another article with this additional detail be better? -drd 196.25.255.250 13:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Once I hit the line about hard drive marketing the rest of the article suddenly seemed to veer into increasing irrelevance —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.123.104 ( talk) 16:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Techniques, different methods and their pros and cons, touching subjects such as instantaneous, short term and long term bandwidth estimation. Also missing information about frequency, bursts, and usage scenarios for the measurement results. Which methods are applicable for certain network types?
In regards to the article stating max TCP Window Size of 65536 bytes: TCP Window sizing has different default sizes for different Operating Systems, and can be tunable on most operating systems. 63.250.222.254 ( talk) 22:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I thought the format of the definition was a bit strange
=> Max. Throughput = TCP Window Size / Round-trip time.
Is this really how definitions should be formated on Wikipedia?
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The Evaluation Engineering article on how to accurately measure bandwidth is an irrelevant reference I will remove it within 48hrs. Kendirangu 15:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
I think the section "Kibi, mebi, gibi, tebi, and pebi prefixes", while interesting is not exactly on topic. The section "Nomenclature" neatly summarises kilo vs kibi differences. Would not a link to another article with this additional detail be better? -drd 196.25.255.250 13:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Once I hit the line about hard drive marketing the rest of the article suddenly seemed to veer into increasing irrelevance —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.123.104 ( talk) 16:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Techniques, different methods and their pros and cons, touching subjects such as instantaneous, short term and long term bandwidth estimation. Also missing information about frequency, bursts, and usage scenarios for the measurement results. Which methods are applicable for certain network types?
In regards to the article stating max TCP Window Size of 65536 bytes: TCP Window sizing has different default sizes for different Operating Systems, and can be tunable on most operating systems. 63.250.222.254 ( talk) 22:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I thought the format of the definition was a bit strange
=> Max. Throughput = TCP Window Size / Round-trip time.
Is this really how definitions should be formated on Wikipedia?