This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
While it is true that the McKeen railmotor did run in Victoria, it is a complete misconception to believe that you can or should have a location-specific article for a machine that operated in many countries around the world, and was particularly popular in the United States. The information I have added to this article is fully cited and completely relevant; please do not remove it again. Only through this spirit of collaboration can we have a stronger WP for everyone - not just Ozzies. Thx. • Freechild 'sup? 14:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that the first data mentioned in the article is 1905, but the "build date" in the infobox is 1914. Why? - Arch dude 00:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The pre-existing article McKeen Motor Car Company was the logical place for all this extra info about the Australian use of these cars. Some content has now been moved from that article to this one. IMO, there is no need to have two articles about this; the company's entire business was producing these cars, so having one article about the company and another about the cars seems like it'll just end up with duplication and confusion.
I propose that the two be merged. Thoughts? If nobody has any opinion I'll proceed to perform a merge and include lots more detail. Matthew Brown (Morven) ( T: C) 17:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
This article would be greatly improved if an acccount of the complex mechanical transmission was included, and other aspects of the innovative technology ofthese railcars was included. Barney Bruchstein ( talk) 21:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on McKeen railmotor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
While it is true that the McKeen railmotor did run in Victoria, it is a complete misconception to believe that you can or should have a location-specific article for a machine that operated in many countries around the world, and was particularly popular in the United States. The information I have added to this article is fully cited and completely relevant; please do not remove it again. Only through this spirit of collaboration can we have a stronger WP for everyone - not just Ozzies. Thx. • Freechild 'sup? 14:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that the first data mentioned in the article is 1905, but the "build date" in the infobox is 1914. Why? - Arch dude 00:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The pre-existing article McKeen Motor Car Company was the logical place for all this extra info about the Australian use of these cars. Some content has now been moved from that article to this one. IMO, there is no need to have two articles about this; the company's entire business was producing these cars, so having one article about the company and another about the cars seems like it'll just end up with duplication and confusion.
I propose that the two be merged. Thoughts? If nobody has any opinion I'll proceed to perform a merge and include lots more detail. Matthew Brown (Morven) ( T: C) 17:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
This article would be greatly improved if an acccount of the complex mechanical transmission was included, and other aspects of the innovative technology ofthese railcars was included. Barney Bruchstein ( talk) 21:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on McKeen railmotor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)