This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
We're actually supposed to replace non-free content wherever possible according to our rules about copyrighted material. ...original images and sound files licensed under the GFDL or in the public domain are greatly preferred to copyrighted media files used under fair use.
Accordingly I've made an image which accomplishes the same thing as the two non-free images currently used, it includes details similar to Image:MD12-poster.jpg, but with a livery based on earlier concept images, and includes the views shown in Image:MD-12 3-view.gif.
Why do we illustrate this article with an A380??
The poster image referred to above actually looks like an MD product. Either bring it back or redo the CG image to reflect it. Please. -- Pete ( talk) 01:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Article table stated Mach 0.85 - this seems ok. Then followed 565 mph and 1050 km/h. First - IF 1050 km/h is correct, then the speed in knots becomes 1050/1.852 = 567. Hence I changed mph to knots. (1 knot = 1 nautical miles per hour = 1852 meters). However both 1050 km/h and 565 (or 567) knots both seem to be a little to high. In the future I strongly suggest to use knots about ships and piston enined aircraft. And both MACH number and knots for all kindds of jet engined aircraft. These two figures must be correct. The MACH number isn't directly calculated into any other speed, since it depends on how thin or thick the air is (see Mach number). When the correct units are presented, can they well be calculated to both mph and km/h. But neither is used within avionics (perhaps some Russian aircraft uses indicated km/h, and very old airplane from UK uses mph. But here are the used units within modern aviation:
These are all well sourcered in their repectively articles. Boeing720 ( talk) 11:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McDonnell Douglas MD-12. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
We're actually supposed to replace non-free content wherever possible according to our rules about copyrighted material. ...original images and sound files licensed under the GFDL or in the public domain are greatly preferred to copyrighted media files used under fair use.
Accordingly I've made an image which accomplishes the same thing as the two non-free images currently used, it includes details similar to Image:MD12-poster.jpg, but with a livery based on earlier concept images, and includes the views shown in Image:MD-12 3-view.gif.
Why do we illustrate this article with an A380??
The poster image referred to above actually looks like an MD product. Either bring it back or redo the CG image to reflect it. Please. -- Pete ( talk) 01:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Article table stated Mach 0.85 - this seems ok. Then followed 565 mph and 1050 km/h. First - IF 1050 km/h is correct, then the speed in knots becomes 1050/1.852 = 567. Hence I changed mph to knots. (1 knot = 1 nautical miles per hour = 1852 meters). However both 1050 km/h and 565 (or 567) knots both seem to be a little to high. In the future I strongly suggest to use knots about ships and piston enined aircraft. And both MACH number and knots for all kindds of jet engined aircraft. These two figures must be correct. The MACH number isn't directly calculated into any other speed, since it depends on how thin or thick the air is (see Mach number). When the correct units are presented, can they well be calculated to both mph and km/h. But neither is used within avionics (perhaps some Russian aircraft uses indicated km/h, and very old airplane from UK uses mph. But here are the used units within modern aviation:
These are all well sourcered in their repectively articles. Boeing720 ( talk) 11:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McDonnell Douglas MD-12. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)