This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
McAbee Fossil Beds article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
would welcome improvements. Eocene guy ( talk) 04:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
happy to see some improvements here by kevmin.
Have been finding other Wiki pages that refer to the McAbee Fossil Beds under other names - Cache Creek fossil site, McAbee locality etc., and linking back to this page.
Anyone referring to the McAbee fossil site as 'Cache Creek', would appreciate you using on your Wikipages the correct name which is McAbee. Cache Creek is the name of the nearby town. Eocene guy ( talk) 02:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
If there is a map that could be added or relevant pictures of the site or of fossils from the site, these would be great additions. Eocene guy ( talk) 12:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
The text stating McAbee was listed on CRHP was removed claiming it 'misstates what the CRHP is/does'. I think the user read something into the text that was neither implied nor explicitly stated. The text simply states that it was listed on the Register, which is true. A link is provided to the CRHP Wikipedia article so any reader can check there and see that the CRHP is a listing and does not confer any additional status or protections. Eocene guy ( talk) 17:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McAbee Fossil Beds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
McAbee Fossil Beds article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
would welcome improvements. Eocene guy ( talk) 04:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
happy to see some improvements here by kevmin.
Have been finding other Wiki pages that refer to the McAbee Fossil Beds under other names - Cache Creek fossil site, McAbee locality etc., and linking back to this page.
Anyone referring to the McAbee fossil site as 'Cache Creek', would appreciate you using on your Wikipages the correct name which is McAbee. Cache Creek is the name of the nearby town. Eocene guy ( talk) 02:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
If there is a map that could be added or relevant pictures of the site or of fossils from the site, these would be great additions. Eocene guy ( talk) 12:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
The text stating McAbee was listed on CRHP was removed claiming it 'misstates what the CRHP is/does'. I think the user read something into the text that was neither implied nor explicitly stated. The text simply states that it was listed on the Register, which is true. A link is provided to the CRHP Wikipedia article so any reader can check there and see that the CRHP is a listing and does not confer any additional status or protections. Eocene guy ( talk) 17:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McAbee Fossil Beds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)