This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mayoralty of Pete Buttigieg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Mayoralty of Pete Buttigieg has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 21, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during
his mayoralty of South Bend, Indiana,
Pete Buttigieg faced controversy when he fired the city's first
African-American police chief for wiretapping? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi @ SecretName101: I saw this article listed on WP:GAN. I don't have capacity to pick up the review at this time, but I just wanted to leave a quick note and state that the lead section should be revised and expanded. It is currently too short. Per MOS:LEAD, a lead should provide an overview of all of the article's main points. Additionally, I note that there are citations currently present in the lead. This is likely acceptable under MOS:LEADCITE, but I question whether his nickname of "Mayor Pete" deserves mention in the lead section.
I might be able to pick up the review in the future, if another editor doesn't step in before I do. Edge3 ( talk) 19:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
SecretName101 ( talk) 19:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Edge3: per your request to inform you if I resubmitted this article for Good Article consideration, I am informing you. SecretName101 ( talk) 19:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Edge3: I have implemented a number of changes based off the feedback you have already suggested. A few concerns that I found with your feedback,
Also..
SecretName101 ( talk) 22:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk)
11:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by SecretName101 ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
New GA; I made a quite number of copyedits but the article is otherwise well sourced and neutrally written after the GA review. For any of the hooks, you should replace the main link with
his mayoralty to reduce duplication. I like the original or Alt3 best, except remove "a period of" since we know 1,000 days is a period of time. Alt2 should be "came out as gay".
Reywas92
Talk
00:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mayoralty of Pete Buttigieg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Mayoralty of Pete Buttigieg has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 21, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during
his mayoralty of South Bend, Indiana,
Pete Buttigieg faced controversy when he fired the city's first
African-American police chief for wiretapping? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi @ SecretName101: I saw this article listed on WP:GAN. I don't have capacity to pick up the review at this time, but I just wanted to leave a quick note and state that the lead section should be revised and expanded. It is currently too short. Per MOS:LEAD, a lead should provide an overview of all of the article's main points. Additionally, I note that there are citations currently present in the lead. This is likely acceptable under MOS:LEADCITE, but I question whether his nickname of "Mayor Pete" deserves mention in the lead section.
I might be able to pick up the review in the future, if another editor doesn't step in before I do. Edge3 ( talk) 19:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
SecretName101 ( talk) 19:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Edge3: per your request to inform you if I resubmitted this article for Good Article consideration, I am informing you. SecretName101 ( talk) 19:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
@ Edge3: I have implemented a number of changes based off the feedback you have already suggested. A few concerns that I found with your feedback,
Also..
SecretName101 ( talk) 22:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk)
11:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by SecretName101 ( talk). Self-nominated at 19:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
New GA; I made a quite number of copyedits but the article is otherwise well sourced and neutrally written after the GA review. For any of the hooks, you should replace the main link with
his mayoralty to reduce duplication. I like the original or Alt3 best, except remove "a period of" since we know 1,000 days is a period of time. Alt2 should be "came out as gay".
Reywas92
Talk
00:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)