This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-02-20. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A tag, in this case a notability tag, is a broadcast for assistance. The tag puts the article in the category of "Articles with topics of unclear notability". There are editors who go around improving articles. They look in a category to find articles to work on. Some people like to "wikify" articles. Others like to improve the writing style. Some find references for articles. Editors go to a category and pick an article to improve. Putting a tag on an article makes it more likely that someone will improve the article.
I am restoring the notability tag. If you want other editors to help improve this article, please leave the tag in place. Sbowers3 ( talk) 00:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Your references help to verify the content of the article, but do not help demonstrate notability. For that you need references from independent, reputable sources such as newspapers or magazines. Sbowers3 ( talk) 03:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm unsure what notable means in this case. Are you looking for more media coverage? I know of a consistent amount of local media coverage (Maui News) over 3 decades. Only their more recent articles are online. I could try to dig up the older articles that are not online. There are also a number of grants and donations. I did see a definition of notable meaning the organization has to contribute to the culture of the area. Btakita( talk) 19 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 07:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
(outdenting) I think it now satisfies the notability guideline and will pass the AFD. Here are a few things I did, which you could do in the future (on this article or other articles).
I'm not a great writer but I think the article is at least okay. Sbowers3 ( talk) 23:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-02-20. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A tag, in this case a notability tag, is a broadcast for assistance. The tag puts the article in the category of "Articles with topics of unclear notability". There are editors who go around improving articles. They look in a category to find articles to work on. Some people like to "wikify" articles. Others like to improve the writing style. Some find references for articles. Editors go to a category and pick an article to improve. Putting a tag on an article makes it more likely that someone will improve the article.
I am restoring the notability tag. If you want other editors to help improve this article, please leave the tag in place. Sbowers3 ( talk) 00:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Your references help to verify the content of the article, but do not help demonstrate notability. For that you need references from independent, reputable sources such as newspapers or magazines. Sbowers3 ( talk) 03:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm unsure what notable means in this case. Are you looking for more media coverage? I know of a consistent amount of local media coverage (Maui News) over 3 decades. Only their more recent articles are online. I could try to dig up the older articles that are not online. There are also a number of grants and donations. I did see a definition of notable meaning the organization has to contribute to the culture of the area. Btakita( talk) 19 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 07:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
(outdenting) I think it now satisfies the notability guideline and will pass the AFD. Here are a few things I did, which you could do in the future (on this article or other articles).
I'm not a great writer but I think the article is at least okay. Sbowers3 ( talk) 23:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)