This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Women's History This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

There has got to be some better way of disambiguating this woman, rather than this POV neologism. Agricolae ( talk) 15:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I agree. Maud de Lacy, Countess of Gloucester or Maud de Lacy, Countess of Hertford would be suitable alternatives.-- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 16:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Please take your pick and go for it. Agricolae ( talk) 19:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply

 Done:::It has been done!-- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 07:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply