![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2021 and 11 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Bmart20.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 03:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This page is pretty rampant with non-NPOV sentiments, isn't it? - Chinju
Maybe. Why don't you try to fix it? :P wshun 21:39, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
I propose that the orphaned article Mathematics education in Australia be merged into this one, perhaps in a section highlighting mathematics education in various countries around the world. I don't feel the other article deserves its own place (the orphan status should be evidence enough of that). -- JS talk 19:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
There were chunks of material about controversies in modern U.S. mathematics education scatterd throughout the article. This broke up the flow of the article and made it difficult to read. I have re-arranged the article to collect all the material about modern U.S. mathematics education into one section. I did not attempt to edit any of this material - I have just done a cut-and-paste job. It would be a good idea if someone edited this section to remove duplication and make it more NPOV - but please keep it all together in one place. Gandalf61 11:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I suggest spinning of one or two articles, either just
history of mathematics education, or this and
history of mathematics instruction in the United States, which would address the controversy, currently covered by what I see as the overly specific articles
math wars,
traditional mathematics, and
reform math (note the inconsistent use of math/mathematics).
Dialectric (
talk)
23:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I think that mathematics education and research all over the world are somewhat connected, but it seems that if the "deep" coverage is US-centric, then starting another page particularly for the US would be the best way of handling it. I'd be more than willing to head this move up, if others think it's a good move. Therealcaro ( talk) 07:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
I have started a math education for the US page at Mathematics Education in the United States, and removed the information here that stuck out awkwardly, and placed it there. Thanks, Therealcaro ( talk) 03:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
The comment about van Hiele Levels was completely erroneous, so I removed it. The Van Hiele model only applies to geometry and is NOT age-dependent. Seberle 16:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it should be written that some countries are far behind others when it comes to level of math. Just yesterday I found out a friend of mine who left Israel and went to Singapore several years ago, started learning in tenth grade material which is learned in Israel only in the university. And he's not attending a geniuses' school (it's a private one, but it works according to some international standard). There is a lad from China who's learning with me in the same math class (5 units) material he learned in China when he was a ninth grader (we're now 11th graders). Siúnrá ( talk) 10:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
This is really interesting. Perhaps you could find some sources and write about it? DoomedToBeTeaching ( talk) 11:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Please visit Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Easy as pi? to see a discussion about making mathematics articles more accessible to a general readership.
It has been archived at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 35#Easy as pi?.
I would appreciate some help improving the article and perhaps including a mention at this page. Katzmik ( talk) 17:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I feel pretty silly--I didn't even see that Polya was already listed under Mathematics Educators. Sorry!
I was thinking about including Mary P. Dolciani in the Mathematics Educators list. Any objections or comments? Regards, CinchBug | Talk 21:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
No objections here, but at the risk of making the list unnecessarily long or US-focused, this would be my list of the five most influential mathematics educators of the past 50 years in the U.S.: Max Beberman,
Edward Begle,
Mary Dolciani,
John Saxon, and
Thomas Romberg.
Downclimb (
talk)
08:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Dialectric's comment, I've attempted to change all mentions of "math" to "mathematics," which does seem to help the flow. Therealcaro ( talk) 07:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
This seems like an interesting report: "Richard Scheaffer, ed. Working Group on Statistics in Mathematics Education Research (Richard Scheaffer, Martha Aliaga, Marie Diener-West, Joan Garfield, Traci Higgins, Sterling Hilton, Gerunda Hughes, Brian Junker, Henry Kepner, Jeremy Kilpatrick, Richard Lehrer, Frank K. Lester, Ingram Olkin, Dennis Pearl, Alan Schoenfeld, Juliet Shaffer, Edward Silver, William Smith, F. Michael Speed, and Patrick Thompson, Using Statistics Effectively in Mathematics Education Research: A report from a series of workshops organized by the American Statistical Association with funding from the National Science Foundation. The American Statistical Association, 2007", but I am not sure why it appears as a footnote twice? Tkuvho ( talk) 08:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Here is the current final paragraph on the rarity of experiments:
In education research, the current near exclusive teaching & use of qualitative research methods means that any use of randomized trials is attacked on ideological grounds. Nobody says that randomized experiments are perfect. The statisticians and scientists want to do some randomized experiments in education, just like in psychology, public health, economics, etc. Nobody has argued for stopping observational studies and qualitative methods, and many statisticians have acknowledged that such studies are invaluable. Why bother quoting people who are opposed to all randomized studies and who are opposed to all "quantitative methods", and who are trying to argue against the value of even a limited number of randomized experiments in schools? Isn't that the current debate? Kiefer.Wolfowitz ( talk) 22:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
I submit the following paragraph as an improvement: I italize the common wording. I ask for your comments:
This paragraph is shorter and avoids straw-man targets. Thanks Kiefer.Wolfowitz ( talk) 16:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
References
Cook
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).This description does not fit my understanding of classical education. The classical education link links to Medieval university. I'd like to see more sources. Cliff ( talk) 22:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Seberele's edit made this summary:
Citations do not refer to these studies, nor to summaries by NCTM. These citations are already in the general discussion in next section. Citation needed here specifically accusing NCTM of being guilty of reporting poor quality research.
Seberle's comment was misleading.
The citations given preceded the reference to the NCTM. Nobody accused the NCTM of anything. Kiefer. Wolfowitz 13:45, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
>> The New Math method was the topic of one of Tom Lehrer's most popular parody songs, with his introductory remarks to the song: "...in the new approach, as you know, the important thing is to understand what you're doing, rather than to get the right answer."<< The popular culture comics songs are irrevelant to the topic. Please remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.41.165.149 ( talk) 12:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Multiplication and Repeated Addition is currently a long, mostly unreferenced essay about methodology in maths education. Any objection to a content merge to this article? Scopecreep ( talk) 12:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
This is a very new start on this narrow/specialized, but very important topic. Eventually, it may or may not make sense to merge it - but right now it is very much under development. References and links can be added - why not give some time (more than 4 days!) for the group developing this? Henry1776 ( talk) 00:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
The controvery section is well annotated, but may benefit from clarification about the ethical issues concerning mathematics education research. The article may benefit from acknowledging origins of these ethical issues, i.e. these ethical considerations may not be those of the community of researchers, but the ethics of the society at large. Legal requirements, such as Institution Review Board requirements, are also not discussed. In the U.S. the issue of ethics is tied to other historical factors of the school system and the way the school system becomes the theater for working out its social problems; with the need to provide the same quality of education to all, researching a new method of learning poses the risk that the research group may not learn as well.
Another controversy that is not indicated in this article is the origin of mathematical education research. Mathematics education research can "start from the top", from university researchers who have an idea for research and bring it to a participating school for study. Alternatively, it can "start from the bottom" where teachers see reason to implement changes and a researcher steps in to document this work. From my understanding, there are international differences in this respect.
Funding is another controversy not addressed. In the U.S., the NSF is the major funder of mathematics education research, but this comes with provisions of the NSF's agenda which has an outline of "what works".
Another controversy in methodology concerns "Action Research". From my understanding, some countries require action research. In terms of thesis requirements for Ed.D. programs in the US, I have heard that action research has become questioned for various ethical reasons concerning the positioning of researcher (as a teacher) and participants; as well as the validity of the results.
Also, what level of knowledge should participants be given about being in a study? Some people say that educational questions can only do minimal harm, but this really is not a simple matter. Near the end of a freshman Calculus class, a researcher gives the professor a test question on linear functions (with no Calculus). The students answer it, not knowing that it is a research study or consenting to participate; they think it is a test for their grade. Many people would immediately say that no harm is done, but in the U.S. college students must pay for their college classes. In effect, they are unknowingly losing the time they paid for instruction. Looking at it differently, they have less hours of instruction to qualify for the same degree requirement; however students in other sections are not given the researcher's exam and had to do more hours of instruction to qualify for the degree requirement.
Unfortunately, I don't know any sources to quote on any of these ideas on the top of my head. Thelema418 ( talk) 04:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Some people(students) have genuine difficulties in understanding and grasping mathematics than other theoretical subjects like biology and chemistry. They are inherently weak in quick logical thinking and grasping abstract concepts of maths.You can see some people can do calculations quickly in mind and some have hard time doing the same.It seems to me as one of the reasons why some people dislike or fear maths. Where is this point addressed in the article?. I think this point should be addressed if not already present in the article.
Lokesh 2000 ( talk) 05:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
(1_x/m) 2401:4900:51DF:C970:5C06:57B7:5A9D:93A7 ( talk) 14:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
for one thing, it's the only section with subsections in the present article; your thoughts? Fgnievinski ( talk) 22:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
A Manual tag was added to the research section. Since many research findings are about what works in teaching, it is difficult to see how to report on such research without reporting on what research has found to work. Please discuss reasons for this tag. I don't see what to fix. seberle ( talk) 16:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mathematics education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
However so Maths is that it makes Science could precise by when it heads up. Its that Mathematics gives the Metrics, not the fact of Actuals.
Its closer to rational behavior of some precision even when Maths Probabilistic Monotony defined by, terms & distribution, and its integration/summation. Bit of Intro required like Binomial Expansion, Polynomial Expansion over our Linear Algebra which could convulse its heads on.
How does our computer world makes Science not by Mathematics rather by clear abstraction study and still tries to advance its ability on Norms which is observed, however it could differ when Astronomy Metrics slightly goes on in different settings, so all got slightly varies by rather. Kind of Mathematics Education why it is important always needs to be rephrased for one who reads in a just a simple grasp.
—
Dev Anand Sadasivam
t@lk
23:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mathematics education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, How is the topic of standards in the field of mathematics education included in the lead of the article? Eglegg2019 ( talk) 22:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
I added this:
Counting and comparison are the most basic ideas, which are taught in preschool or early primary school. Arithmetic is a central part of primary school mathematics, beginning with addition and subtraction, followed by multiplication and division. Children in primary school also learn about measurement and shapes. Around ages 11 to 14, most students will learn pre-algebra topics.
And Seberle removed it, saying that it was only relevant to the United States. Are there other countries where students do not learn counting and comparison at a very young age, and then arithmetic, as well as measurement and shapes, in primary school? I thought this must be universal. Is your concern with the word "prealgebra"? — Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 17:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Algebra I and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Algebra I until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Algebra II/Trigonometry and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Algebra II/Trigonometry until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Mathematics education effects on the economy of the United States and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Mathematics education effects on the economy of the United States until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
I’m curious why the leading sentence of this page denotes how the phrase “math education” is labeled in Europe. This is a Eurocentric element, considering math education occurs all over the world, and each geographical region may have a respective term for the subject. Aside from a biased viewpoint, these points should not be in the lead sentence due to cluttering (see MOS:LEADCLUTTER). Zyploc ( talk) 19:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2021 and 11 December 2021. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Bmart20.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 03:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This page is pretty rampant with non-NPOV sentiments, isn't it? - Chinju
Maybe. Why don't you try to fix it? :P wshun 21:39, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
I propose that the orphaned article Mathematics education in Australia be merged into this one, perhaps in a section highlighting mathematics education in various countries around the world. I don't feel the other article deserves its own place (the orphan status should be evidence enough of that). -- JS talk 19:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
There were chunks of material about controversies in modern U.S. mathematics education scatterd throughout the article. This broke up the flow of the article and made it difficult to read. I have re-arranged the article to collect all the material about modern U.S. mathematics education into one section. I did not attempt to edit any of this material - I have just done a cut-and-paste job. It would be a good idea if someone edited this section to remove duplication and make it more NPOV - but please keep it all together in one place. Gandalf61 11:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I suggest spinning of one or two articles, either just
history of mathematics education, or this and
history of mathematics instruction in the United States, which would address the controversy, currently covered by what I see as the overly specific articles
math wars,
traditional mathematics, and
reform math (note the inconsistent use of math/mathematics).
Dialectric (
talk)
23:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I think that mathematics education and research all over the world are somewhat connected, but it seems that if the "deep" coverage is US-centric, then starting another page particularly for the US would be the best way of handling it. I'd be more than willing to head this move up, if others think it's a good move. Therealcaro ( talk) 07:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
I have started a math education for the US page at Mathematics Education in the United States, and removed the information here that stuck out awkwardly, and placed it there. Thanks, Therealcaro ( talk) 03:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
The comment about van Hiele Levels was completely erroneous, so I removed it. The Van Hiele model only applies to geometry and is NOT age-dependent. Seberle 16:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it should be written that some countries are far behind others when it comes to level of math. Just yesterday I found out a friend of mine who left Israel and went to Singapore several years ago, started learning in tenth grade material which is learned in Israel only in the university. And he's not attending a geniuses' school (it's a private one, but it works according to some international standard). There is a lad from China who's learning with me in the same math class (5 units) material he learned in China when he was a ninth grader (we're now 11th graders). Siúnrá ( talk) 10:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
This is really interesting. Perhaps you could find some sources and write about it? DoomedToBeTeaching ( talk) 11:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Please visit Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Easy as pi? to see a discussion about making mathematics articles more accessible to a general readership.
It has been archived at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 35#Easy as pi?.
I would appreciate some help improving the article and perhaps including a mention at this page. Katzmik ( talk) 17:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I feel pretty silly--I didn't even see that Polya was already listed under Mathematics Educators. Sorry!
I was thinking about including Mary P. Dolciani in the Mathematics Educators list. Any objections or comments? Regards, CinchBug | Talk 21:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
No objections here, but at the risk of making the list unnecessarily long or US-focused, this would be my list of the five most influential mathematics educators of the past 50 years in the U.S.: Max Beberman,
Edward Begle,
Mary Dolciani,
John Saxon, and
Thomas Romberg.
Downclimb (
talk)
08:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Dialectric's comment, I've attempted to change all mentions of "math" to "mathematics," which does seem to help the flow. Therealcaro ( talk) 07:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
This seems like an interesting report: "Richard Scheaffer, ed. Working Group on Statistics in Mathematics Education Research (Richard Scheaffer, Martha Aliaga, Marie Diener-West, Joan Garfield, Traci Higgins, Sterling Hilton, Gerunda Hughes, Brian Junker, Henry Kepner, Jeremy Kilpatrick, Richard Lehrer, Frank K. Lester, Ingram Olkin, Dennis Pearl, Alan Schoenfeld, Juliet Shaffer, Edward Silver, William Smith, F. Michael Speed, and Patrick Thompson, Using Statistics Effectively in Mathematics Education Research: A report from a series of workshops organized by the American Statistical Association with funding from the National Science Foundation. The American Statistical Association, 2007", but I am not sure why it appears as a footnote twice? Tkuvho ( talk) 08:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Here is the current final paragraph on the rarity of experiments:
In education research, the current near exclusive teaching & use of qualitative research methods means that any use of randomized trials is attacked on ideological grounds. Nobody says that randomized experiments are perfect. The statisticians and scientists want to do some randomized experiments in education, just like in psychology, public health, economics, etc. Nobody has argued for stopping observational studies and qualitative methods, and many statisticians have acknowledged that such studies are invaluable. Why bother quoting people who are opposed to all randomized studies and who are opposed to all "quantitative methods", and who are trying to argue against the value of even a limited number of randomized experiments in schools? Isn't that the current debate? Kiefer.Wolfowitz ( talk) 22:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
I submit the following paragraph as an improvement: I italize the common wording. I ask for your comments:
This paragraph is shorter and avoids straw-man targets. Thanks Kiefer.Wolfowitz ( talk) 16:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
References
Cook
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).This description does not fit my understanding of classical education. The classical education link links to Medieval university. I'd like to see more sources. Cliff ( talk) 22:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Seberele's edit made this summary:
Citations do not refer to these studies, nor to summaries by NCTM. These citations are already in the general discussion in next section. Citation needed here specifically accusing NCTM of being guilty of reporting poor quality research.
Seberle's comment was misleading.
The citations given preceded the reference to the NCTM. Nobody accused the NCTM of anything. Kiefer. Wolfowitz 13:45, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
>> The New Math method was the topic of one of Tom Lehrer's most popular parody songs, with his introductory remarks to the song: "...in the new approach, as you know, the important thing is to understand what you're doing, rather than to get the right answer."<< The popular culture comics songs are irrevelant to the topic. Please remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.41.165.149 ( talk) 12:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Multiplication and Repeated Addition is currently a long, mostly unreferenced essay about methodology in maths education. Any objection to a content merge to this article? Scopecreep ( talk) 12:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
This is a very new start on this narrow/specialized, but very important topic. Eventually, it may or may not make sense to merge it - but right now it is very much under development. References and links can be added - why not give some time (more than 4 days!) for the group developing this? Henry1776 ( talk) 00:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
The controvery section is well annotated, but may benefit from clarification about the ethical issues concerning mathematics education research. The article may benefit from acknowledging origins of these ethical issues, i.e. these ethical considerations may not be those of the community of researchers, but the ethics of the society at large. Legal requirements, such as Institution Review Board requirements, are also not discussed. In the U.S. the issue of ethics is tied to other historical factors of the school system and the way the school system becomes the theater for working out its social problems; with the need to provide the same quality of education to all, researching a new method of learning poses the risk that the research group may not learn as well.
Another controversy that is not indicated in this article is the origin of mathematical education research. Mathematics education research can "start from the top", from university researchers who have an idea for research and bring it to a participating school for study. Alternatively, it can "start from the bottom" where teachers see reason to implement changes and a researcher steps in to document this work. From my understanding, there are international differences in this respect.
Funding is another controversy not addressed. In the U.S., the NSF is the major funder of mathematics education research, but this comes with provisions of the NSF's agenda which has an outline of "what works".
Another controversy in methodology concerns "Action Research". From my understanding, some countries require action research. In terms of thesis requirements for Ed.D. programs in the US, I have heard that action research has become questioned for various ethical reasons concerning the positioning of researcher (as a teacher) and participants; as well as the validity of the results.
Also, what level of knowledge should participants be given about being in a study? Some people say that educational questions can only do minimal harm, but this really is not a simple matter. Near the end of a freshman Calculus class, a researcher gives the professor a test question on linear functions (with no Calculus). The students answer it, not knowing that it is a research study or consenting to participate; they think it is a test for their grade. Many people would immediately say that no harm is done, but in the U.S. college students must pay for their college classes. In effect, they are unknowingly losing the time they paid for instruction. Looking at it differently, they have less hours of instruction to qualify for the same degree requirement; however students in other sections are not given the researcher's exam and had to do more hours of instruction to qualify for the degree requirement.
Unfortunately, I don't know any sources to quote on any of these ideas on the top of my head. Thelema418 ( talk) 04:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Some people(students) have genuine difficulties in understanding and grasping mathematics than other theoretical subjects like biology and chemistry. They are inherently weak in quick logical thinking and grasping abstract concepts of maths.You can see some people can do calculations quickly in mind and some have hard time doing the same.It seems to me as one of the reasons why some people dislike or fear maths. Where is this point addressed in the article?. I think this point should be addressed if not already present in the article.
Lokesh 2000 ( talk) 05:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
(1_x/m) 2401:4900:51DF:C970:5C06:57B7:5A9D:93A7 ( talk) 14:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
for one thing, it's the only section with subsections in the present article; your thoughts? Fgnievinski ( talk) 22:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
A Manual tag was added to the research section. Since many research findings are about what works in teaching, it is difficult to see how to report on such research without reporting on what research has found to work. Please discuss reasons for this tag. I don't see what to fix. seberle ( talk) 16:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mathematics education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
However so Maths is that it makes Science could precise by when it heads up. Its that Mathematics gives the Metrics, not the fact of Actuals.
Its closer to rational behavior of some precision even when Maths Probabilistic Monotony defined by, terms & distribution, and its integration/summation. Bit of Intro required like Binomial Expansion, Polynomial Expansion over our Linear Algebra which could convulse its heads on.
How does our computer world makes Science not by Mathematics rather by clear abstraction study and still tries to advance its ability on Norms which is observed, however it could differ when Astronomy Metrics slightly goes on in different settings, so all got slightly varies by rather. Kind of Mathematics Education why it is important always needs to be rephrased for one who reads in a just a simple grasp.
—
Dev Anand Sadasivam
t@lk
23:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mathematics education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, How is the topic of standards in the field of mathematics education included in the lead of the article? Eglegg2019 ( talk) 22:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
I added this:
Counting and comparison are the most basic ideas, which are taught in preschool or early primary school. Arithmetic is a central part of primary school mathematics, beginning with addition and subtraction, followed by multiplication and division. Children in primary school also learn about measurement and shapes. Around ages 11 to 14, most students will learn pre-algebra topics.
And Seberle removed it, saying that it was only relevant to the United States. Are there other countries where students do not learn counting and comparison at a very young age, and then arithmetic, as well as measurement and shapes, in primary school? I thought this must be universal. Is your concern with the word "prealgebra"? — Naddruf ( talk ~ contribs) 17:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Algebra I and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Algebra I until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Algebra II/Trigonometry and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Algebra II/Trigonometry until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Mathematics education effects on the economy of the United States and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 4 § Mathematics education effects on the economy of the United States until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
I’m curious why the leading sentence of this page denotes how the phrase “math education” is labeled in Europe. This is a Eurocentric element, considering math education occurs all over the world, and each geographical region may have a respective term for the subject. Aside from a biased viewpoint, these points should not be in the lead sentence due to cluttering (see MOS:LEADCLUTTER). Zyploc ( talk) 19:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)