This page was proposed for deletion by Dodger67 ( talk · contribs) on 16 July 2020. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a reason for OpenOffice Math not exporting in this format? Copyright issues maybe? Gimboid 18:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Article has been cleanup to read more like a wiki article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Holsum ( talk • contribs)
I have had another go at cleaning up the article, after my last attempt had objections. To avoid an edit war I have put my proposed new version ( diff from current version) in my user namespace. If there are no comments or objections in a reasonable amount of time then I will copy it to the live article; I will notify LikeLakers2 who recently reverted my edit.
I think the objections before might have been mostly because I removed references. This is because I thought that references always have to be third-party, so I took out all the Design Science references (i.e. all references!). It turns out that some first-party references are allowed, so although the article still needs better references, it was wrong for me to simply rip them all out. My new proposed article keeps a lot of the references, and even adds new ones.
I have still removed the "884 applications" claim, because this is a flat-out lie (as I've explained above, but I'm happy to explain again), but I explained precisely what is supported. I also removed the Acrobat mention again, again because Wikipedia is not a guide and it is well out of date (the reference is from 1999) anyway. Quietbritishjim ( talk) 15:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
<img>
tag. Maybe there are other cases like the Wikipedia one mentioned in the article: the output is just TeX as usual, but wrapped in a wiki <math>
tag. This is hardly a custom translator and definitely not a "microformat". The text that I removed recently misrepresents this. (BTW, if you wrote it, what is EGO?)<img>
tags. Their
works with page has products in all categories. Indeed the majority are just websites that allow image tags, and saying that MathType is compatible with these is a long stretch. It even includes applications where the only option is to export an image from MathType and import it into the application (e.g.
Flash
InDesign
OpenOffice for Mac). No one outside the Design Science marketing department would call these applications "compatible"!
Quietbritishjim (
talk) 14:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)The functionalities of the Design Science and WIRIS versions of MathType (for Mac) are so different that they need separate articles. Xxanthippe ( talk) 05:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC).
This page was proposed for deletion by Dodger67 ( talk · contribs) on 16 July 2020. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a reason for OpenOffice Math not exporting in this format? Copyright issues maybe? Gimboid 18:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Article has been cleanup to read more like a wiki article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Holsum ( talk • contribs)
I have had another go at cleaning up the article, after my last attempt had objections. To avoid an edit war I have put my proposed new version ( diff from current version) in my user namespace. If there are no comments or objections in a reasonable amount of time then I will copy it to the live article; I will notify LikeLakers2 who recently reverted my edit.
I think the objections before might have been mostly because I removed references. This is because I thought that references always have to be third-party, so I took out all the Design Science references (i.e. all references!). It turns out that some first-party references are allowed, so although the article still needs better references, it was wrong for me to simply rip them all out. My new proposed article keeps a lot of the references, and even adds new ones.
I have still removed the "884 applications" claim, because this is a flat-out lie (as I've explained above, but I'm happy to explain again), but I explained precisely what is supported. I also removed the Acrobat mention again, again because Wikipedia is not a guide and it is well out of date (the reference is from 1999) anyway. Quietbritishjim ( talk) 15:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
<img>
tag. Maybe there are other cases like the Wikipedia one mentioned in the article: the output is just TeX as usual, but wrapped in a wiki <math>
tag. This is hardly a custom translator and definitely not a "microformat". The text that I removed recently misrepresents this. (BTW, if you wrote it, what is EGO?)<img>
tags. Their
works with page has products in all categories. Indeed the majority are just websites that allow image tags, and saying that MathType is compatible with these is a long stretch. It even includes applications where the only option is to export an image from MathType and import it into the application (e.g.
Flash
InDesign
OpenOffice for Mac). No one outside the Design Science marketing department would call these applications "compatible"!
Quietbritishjim (
talk) 14:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)The functionalities of the Design Science and WIRIS versions of MathType (for Mac) are so different that they need separate articles. Xxanthippe ( talk) 05:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC).