![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The history section is entirely paraphrased from Neilbert.com (although the note that the new route from Goshen to Buckland followed an existing road was my own, from personal observation born of repeated travel along 112 from 9 to 2). In observing the current routing of 56, I note that it goes nowhere near Shelburne. It's impossible for me to determine whether it was truncated long ago, with other numbers picking up its old route, or if the original route 56 was retired and later brought back on the current road.
I'd like to say something about the condition of the road between Worthington and Cummington (which is to say, it's barely more than a local road, narrow and with sharp curves), but I couldn't really come up with a neutral way to say it. -- Mr Wednesday 21:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The history section is entirely paraphrased from Neilbert.com (although the note that the new route from Goshen to Buckland followed an existing road was my own, from personal observation born of repeated travel along 112 from 9 to 2). In observing the current routing of 56, I note that it goes nowhere near Shelburne. It's impossible for me to determine whether it was truncated long ago, with other numbers picking up its old route, or if the original route 56 was retired and later brought back on the current road.
I'd like to say something about the condition of the road between Worthington and Cummington (which is to say, it's barely more than a local road, narrow and with sharp curves), but I couldn't really come up with a neutral way to say it. -- Mr Wednesday 21:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)