This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
why were they massacred? Saccerzd 21:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there a particular reason to mention that 5 of the massacred were priests? How many of them were, say, carpenters, teachers, librarians, plumbers or car mechanics? Naphra 00:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I believe at the monument in Marzabotto that they include the number of the priests. It is also important because, at least among European and Christian society priests generally are not targeted and such in war when possible. Not that that always happens though. Italy is also a very Cahtolic country, even more so at the time, where the Church and priests are important within society. If a breakdown of victims by occupation can be found then put it in, but priests can be found as it is one that is important enough for the survivors themselves to include.
"It was the worst massacre of civilians committed by the Waffen SS in Western Europe during the war" Presumably there were worse massacre of Jews, also citizens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codish ( talk • contribs) 03:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The article is still very brief, but it has been modestly expanded since the {expert} tag was put into place last June. The leading problem at that time was the lack of context for the massacre: why did it happen? The article now (very briefly) covers this, and although the article is very much a stub and could certainly use expanding, I propose that the {expert} tag be deleted, as I cannot see what particularly calls for an expert. Mmccalpin 04:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
This makes no sense:
45 were less than 2-years-old, 110 were less than 10-years-old, 95 were less than 16-years-old
If, for example, 110 were less than 10 years old, that same 110 were also less than 16, thus the total under 16 cannot be 95. Whoever has access to the actual numbers should clean this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.134.23.211 ( talk) 16:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
In one part of the article it very specifically says 955 people were massacred, in another it is vague and says "it is estimated that over 700 people...".
195.212.29.75 15:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
-- Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog ( talk) 13:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marzabotto massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
why were they massacred? Saccerzd 21:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Is there a particular reason to mention that 5 of the massacred were priests? How many of them were, say, carpenters, teachers, librarians, plumbers or car mechanics? Naphra 00:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I believe at the monument in Marzabotto that they include the number of the priests. It is also important because, at least among European and Christian society priests generally are not targeted and such in war when possible. Not that that always happens though. Italy is also a very Cahtolic country, even more so at the time, where the Church and priests are important within society. If a breakdown of victims by occupation can be found then put it in, but priests can be found as it is one that is important enough for the survivors themselves to include.
"It was the worst massacre of civilians committed by the Waffen SS in Western Europe during the war" Presumably there were worse massacre of Jews, also citizens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codish ( talk • contribs) 03:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The article is still very brief, but it has been modestly expanded since the {expert} tag was put into place last June. The leading problem at that time was the lack of context for the massacre: why did it happen? The article now (very briefly) covers this, and although the article is very much a stub and could certainly use expanding, I propose that the {expert} tag be deleted, as I cannot see what particularly calls for an expert. Mmccalpin 04:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
This makes no sense:
45 were less than 2-years-old, 110 were less than 10-years-old, 95 were less than 16-years-old
If, for example, 110 were less than 10 years old, that same 110 were also less than 16, thus the total under 16 cannot be 95. Whoever has access to the actual numbers should clean this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.134.23.211 ( talk) 16:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
In one part of the article it very specifically says 955 people were massacred, in another it is vague and says "it is estimated that over 700 people...".
195.212.29.75 15:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
-- Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog ( talk) 13:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marzabotto massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)